No description or website provided.
CoffeeScript Shell
Latest commit a8a9572 Nov 18, 2015 Fabien Fleutot added license
Failed to load latest commit information.
doc testing while loops Jan 10, 2011
src minor changes Feb 25, 2011
test - Jan 20, 2011
LICENSE.txt added license Nov 18, 2015
readme.txt README update Dec 31, 2010 big overhaul: moved to node 0.3.1, to coffeescript 1.0; radical refac… Jan 6, 2011


                          Parsec Coffee-Script


Parsec Coffee Script (PCS) is a parser / compiler for the
coffee-script language, based on parser combinators. The project's aim
is to add static metaprogramming (i.e. macros + syntax extensibility)
to Coffee Script (CS), similar to how Metalua adds such features to
Lua. The resulting compiler, once merged with the official compiler,
should be usable as a drop-in replacement for it.


The project is decomposed into several steps:

1. Development of the Lexer. Compared to the official CS lexer, it
   must be single pass: no rewriting stage, direct handling of string
   and regex interpolation. [IN PROGRESS]

2. Development of the generic parsec library, GrammarGenerator
   (GG). It doesn't need to have a compact/fluid API yet: the final
   API will be based on a static DSL, once PCS is bootstrapped and
   able to define it. [DONE]

3. Implementation of the coffee-script parser (PCS) with GG 

4. Defining an Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) format [DONE].

5. Merge with Coffee-Script's compiler backend Node.js

At this stage, PCS will be a fully functional Coffee-Script compiler.

6. Implementation of splice (the fundamental operator of static

7. Development of a static DSL, making the definition of GG grammars
   terser and more readable. At this stage, GG grammars are expected
   to be more readable than Bison-inspired grammar definitions.

8. Lift (inverse operator of splice) + quasi-quotes

9. Focus on GG usability: good error messages on syntactically
   incorrect inputs, error recovery for multiple errors detection,
   automated bookkeeping of source/Abstract Syntax Tree (AST)

10. To be determined: macro hygiene, experimental language extensions,
    modularisation of Coffee-Script (implement non-core features as
    syntax extensions, in order to simplify the AST->js compiler)...

A word about static MP and parsec.

Static metaprogramming allows to execute arbitrary code during
compilation, and to splice user-program-generated AST fragments into
the compiler-generated AST.

Parser combinators are a way to define grammars, especially suitable
to functional languages. Parsers are regular functions, which take
token streams and return AST. Parsers can be defined from scratch, as
regular functions; but the specificity of the parsec approach is the
use of combinators: functions which take simple parsers as arguments,
and return a more complex parser as a result.

Benefits of the parsec approach: 

- In addition to standard combinators (sequence, choice,
  repetition...), some more specific parsers can be defined,
  e.g. expression generators properly handling prefix, infix and
  suffix operators, precedence, associativity, etc. Ad-hoc support for
  common combinators can be backed into Bison-like generators, but
  can't be tailored unless one considers patching the compiler.

- Since parsers are first-class objects (functions), unusual
  operations can be supported through specific functions. In a Bison +
  host language 2-staged approach, there's a big impedance mismatch
  when one wants to mess with the parsing stages in ways not intended
  by Bison; if the parser merely combines plain functions, special
  actions can be easily taken at any stage.

- Most importantly, parsecs can be modified dynamically. Therefore,
  some code in a splice can extend the grammar being recognized in the
  middle of a file being parsed. This allows a file to define and/or
  load grammar extensions seamlessly, reclaiming most of Lisp's
  flexibility, without the constraints Lisp-style macros put on
  superficial syntax.