Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner. It is now read-only.

Look into reducing base image size #62

Closed
fgrehm opened this issue Aug 5, 2014 · 2 comments
Closed

Look into reducing base image size #62

fgrehm opened this issue Aug 5, 2014 · 2 comments

Comments

@fgrehm
Copy link
Owner

fgrehm commented Aug 5, 2014

Maybe use debian:jessie as a starting point or even https://github.com/docker-library/docker-buildpack-deps (https://registry.hub.docker.com/_/buildpack-deps/)

@fgrehm fgrehm added this to the v0.2.0 milestone Aug 5, 2014
@fgrehm fgrehm modified the milestones: v0.2.0, v0.3.0 Sep 8, 2014
@fgrehm
Copy link
Owner Author

fgrehm commented Sep 8, 2014

Switching to progrium/cedarish:cedar14 lowered the base image from 1.168GB to 867.7MB for v0.2.0, we can lower it even more by removing nodejs, bazaar, mercurial and possibly other stuff from the base and I'll look into it on 0.3.0

@fgrehm fgrehm modified the milestones: v0.3.0, v0.2.0 Sep 9, 2014
@fgrehm fgrehm modified the milestone: v0.3.0 Jan 15, 2015
@fgrehm
Copy link
Owner Author

fgrehm commented Jul 7, 2015

Heroku's cedar image is around 1.2GB and 0.4.0 is at 1.4GB, can't do much here besides moving on to another base which I don't see happening anytime soon =/

Ideas on how to handle this are welcomed!

@fgrehm fgrehm closed this as completed Jul 7, 2015
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant