Skip to content

Conversation

@egilmorez
Copy link
Contributor

Adding initial changes for us to build out for functions.handler reference.

Staged internally at https://firebase.devsite.corp.google.com/docs/reference/functions/handler_builder_.handlerbuilder?skip_cache=true

Thanks!

@laurenzlong
Copy link
Contributor

@egilmorez feel free to merge this PR now.

@egilmorez egilmorez merged commit ca2d3c8 into launch.handler-docs Mar 20, 2020
@egilmorez egilmorez deleted the eg-toplevel-handler branch March 20, 2020 20:52
egilmorez added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2020
* Adding top-level comment and TOC for functions.handler.

* Adding edits from feedback.

* Refer specifically to Firebase CLI.
laurenzlong added a commit that referenced this pull request May 1, 2020
* Adding top-level comment and TOC for functions.handler. (#633)

* Adding top-level comment and TOC for functions.handler.

* Adding edits from feedback.

* Refer specifically to Firebase CLI.

* Adding top-level comment and TOC for functions.handler. (#633)

* Adding top-level comment and TOC for functions.handler.

* Adding edits from feedback.

* Refer specifically to Firebase CLI.

* Pin "typedoc" version to 0.14.2 (#655)

* Add docstrings for handler.firestore, handler.database, and handler.https (#652)

* Document a few providers

* Remove extra sentence in http function docstring

* Crashlytics handler details and example formatting (#656)

* Adding comments for Crashlytics handler.

* Removing parens for parameters per feedback.

* Eg moar handlers (#657)

* Adding RC and Analytics handlers.

* Adding Storage object handler.

* Adding Pub/Sub and Test Lab handlers.

* Adding auth handler.

* Fixing typo.

* Removing async to be consistent among examples. (#658)

* handler functions: copy-edits in comments only (#675)

* Removing async syntax from Storage handlers. (#678)

Co-authored-by: egilmorez <egilmore@google.com>
Co-authored-by: rachelsaunders <52258509+rachelsaunders@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants