feat(linux-client): reduce number of TUN threads to 1#8914
Merged
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
jamilbk
approved these changes
Apr 28, 2025
Member
Author
I am very certain that segmentation offloading for the TUN device will give us better performance than multi-threading so I wouldn't be surprised if we don't need it at all. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Having multiple threads for reading and writing the TUN device can cause packet re-orderings on the client. All other clients only use a single TUN thread, so aligning this value means a more consistent behaviour of Firezone across all platforms.