vi binding 'e' has wrong behaviour on second-to-last char

[Ambrevar]

• fish, version 2.5.0-384-g9e64571d
• OS: Arch Linux
• Term: Urxvt 9.22

Using vi bindings, if the cursor is on 1 in

12 345

pressing e in normal mode will move to 5 while it should move to 2.

The current definition of e is

bind e forward-char forward-word backward-char

I believe the following binding to be correct:

bind e forward-word backward-char

[faho]

This was added to fix #2171.

I believe the following binding to be correct:

bind e forward-word backward-char

That binding has the issue that it will get stuck on "bigwords". E.g. executing it multiple times on "12-345" will have the cursor go to "2", then "-" and then get stuck there.

We probably need to introduce additional bind functions here - "end-of-word" and "beginning-of-word".