Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fish 3.0.1? #5520

Closed
7 tasks done
zanchey opened this issue Jan 12, 2019 · 11 comments
Closed
7 tasks done

fish 3.0.1? #5520

zanchey opened this issue Jan 12, 2019 · 11 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@zanchey
Copy link
Member

zanchey commented Jan 12, 2019

I'm asking for opinions on whether to put out a 3.0.1 to fix showstopping bugs following 3.0.0, and what to include. I would be aiming to get it out this month. Otherwise they will have to wait for 3.1.0, which I've got planned for March or so.

Candidates include:

@zanchey zanchey self-assigned this Jan 12, 2019
@zanchey zanchey added the RFC label Jan 12, 2019
@mqudsi
Copy link
Contributor

mqudsi commented Jan 12, 2019

I think the OpenIndiana folks are doing a fine job incorporating patches and updates post 3.0, so #5458 isn't very important. The others all sound worth including.

@cdluminate
Copy link
Contributor

cdluminate commented Jan 12, 2019

I (Debian developer maintaining fish) second the request for the 3.0.1 release. We are reaching the freezing stage of the next stable release (aka. Debian Buster) [1]. And the timing of 3.1.0 release sounds too late for Debian Buster. So I think releasing 3.0.1 would make great sense.

[1] https://release.debian.org/

@faho
Copy link
Member

faho commented Jan 12, 2019

I'm all for doing a bugfix release!

The question is always how big we want it to be?

I would say anything from https://github.com/fish-shell/fish-shell/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aclosed+milestone%3A%22fish+3.1.0%22+ is a candidate here.

Some things I think should be included:

And some maybes:

@floam
Copy link
Member

floam commented Jan 14, 2019

Yes, I think we should, there are a few real stinkers that would be nice to get out of the way so we can focus on having time to do a nice 3.1.

@mqudsi
Copy link
Contributor

mqudsi commented Jan 14, 2019

I personally view #5513 as worthy of a 3.0.1 all on its own, but maybe that's just me.

@drupol

This comment has been minimized.

@faho faho added this to the fish 3.0.1 milestone Jan 17, 2019
@ridiculousfish
Copy link
Member

I've got two weeks free, I can definitely do this.

@ridiculousfish
Copy link
Member

master has diverged too far so 3.0.1 should be based on 3.0.0. I've added an Integration_3.0.1 branch to origin, let's fix the 3.0.1 issues in master, and cherry-pick into Integration_3.0.1.

@zanchey zanchey removed the RFC label Jan 26, 2019
@ridiculousfish
Copy link
Member

Milestone is complete, let's do it!

@faho faho added the packaging label Jan 28, 2019
@zanchey
Copy link
Member Author

zanchey commented Jan 29, 2019

Awesome - well done. I should have time to roll the release in the next week or so (perhaps even tonight).

@ridiculousfish
Copy link
Member

Thanks everyone for the hard and timely work here!

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 17, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants