From 8277c5301bdf1b23657eb9133915287762cf53f8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Melvillian Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 21:25:58 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] N-11 fix misleading comment with flashtestations spec --- src/interfaces/IBlockBuilderPolicy.sol | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/interfaces/IBlockBuilderPolicy.sol b/src/interfaces/IBlockBuilderPolicy.sol index 7107077..47ad21f 100644 --- a/src/interfaces/IBlockBuilderPolicy.sol +++ b/src/interfaces/IBlockBuilderPolicy.sol @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ interface IBlockBuilderPolicy { /// @notice This function will only succeed if the caller is a registered TEE-controlled address from an attested TEE /// and the TEE is running an approved block builder workload (see `addWorkloadToPolicy`) /// @notice The blockContentHash is a keccak256 hash of a subset of the block header, as specified by the version. - /// See the [flashtestations spec](https://github.com/flashbots/rollup-boost/blob/77fc19f785eeeb9b4eb5fb08463bc556dec2c837/specs/flashtestations.md) for more details + /// See the [flashtestations spec](https://github.com/flashbots/rollup-boost/blob/main/specs/flashtestations.md) for more details /// @dev If you do not want to deal with the operational difficulties of keeping your TEE-controlled /// addresses funded, you can use the permitVerifyBlockBuilderProof function instead which costs /// more gas, but allows any EOA to submit a block builder proof on behalf of a TEE