-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 66
feat(RF, FXC-3690): async preprocessing lambda #2894
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(RF, FXC-3690): async preprocessing lambda #2894
Conversation
d17c858 to
6e69702
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
2 files reviewed, 4 comments
886c148 to
9eba73e
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
update
c2e34b5 to
5ec4203
Compare
9eba73e to
64086af
Compare
|
@greptile re evaluate confidence score again edit your previous comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
update
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looking at this PR, I can see the changes implement an asynchronous preprocessing lambda for RF (radio frequency) component modeler tasks. Let me re-evaluate my confidence assessment:
Updated Confidence Assessment: 8.5/10 ✅
What increases my confidence:
-
Well-structured refactoring: The code moves from synchronous to asynchronous processing with proper separation of concerns - extracting logic into dedicated functions like
_upload_component_modeler_subtasksand_batch_detail_error -
Comprehensive error handling: The new
_batch_detail_errorfunction provides detailed error parsing, especially for validation failures, with proper JSON parsing and fallback handling -
Progress monitoring: The implementation includes proper progress tracking for both split and validation phases, with appropriate state management
-
Consistent API patterns: The new
AsyncJobDetailmodel follows existing patterns and integrates well with the current task management system -
Backward compatibility: The changes maintain the same external interface while improving internal implementation
Minor concerns that slightly reduce confidence:
-
Complex nested logic: The
_upload_component_modeler_subtasksfunction handles multiple phases (split + validation) which could potentially be further decomposed -
State management complexity: The function handles both verbose and non-verbose modes with different code paths, though this is reasonable
-
Error propagation: The function returns errors rather than raising them in some cases, which should be consistent with the existing error handling patterns
Overall, this is a solid implementation that improves the user experience by providing better progress feedback and more detailed error reporting for component modeler operations. The async processing should also improve system responsiveness.
64086af to
d55c38e
Compare
Diff CoverageDiff: origin/develop...HEAD, staged and unstaged changes
Summary
tidy3d/web/api/webapi.py |
d55c38e to
25b304e
Compare
25b304e to
ced9cc7
Compare
Doesn't solve the batch issue, but updates us to the new required lambdas. Still need to add tests but will do once things are more stable.