Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added CompareBy{Members,Value}(Type) #1389

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Sep 19, 2020

Conversation

jnyrup
Copy link
Member

@jnyrup jnyrup commented Sep 16, 2020

The new overloads allows you to use an open generic type.
If both an open and closed type are specified, the closed type takes precedence.

This fixes #1388, #1023

@jnyrup jnyrup linked an issue Sep 16, 2020 that may be closed by this pull request
The new overloads allows you to use an open generic type.
If both an open and close type are specified, the closed type takes
precedence.

This fixes fluentassertions#1388
Copy link
Member

@dennisdoomen dennisdoomen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice!

@jnyrup jnyrup merged commit dcfc419 into fluentassertions:develop Sep 19, 2020
@jnyrup jnyrup deleted the compareByOpenGenericType branch September 20, 2020 14:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

AssertEquivalencyUsing support for unbound generic types ComparingByMembers for open generic type
2 participants