Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Address previous comments, fix Intent.doNothing. #41417

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Sep 27, 2019

Conversation

gspencergoog
Copy link
Contributor

@gspencergoog gspencergoog commented Sep 26, 2019

Description

This addresses comments in the original PR (#41245) that introduced Intent.doNothing, adds tests, and fixes an issue with it.

Related Issues

Tests

  • Added tests for Intent.doNothing.

Checklist

Before you create this PR confirm that it meets all requirements listed below by checking the relevant checkboxes ([x]). This will ensure a smooth and quick review process.

  • I read the Contributor Guide and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs.
  • I signed the CLA.
  • I read and followed the Flutter Style Guide, including Features we expect every widget to implement.
  • I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with ///).
  • All existing and new tests are passing.
  • The analyzer (flutter analyze --flutter-repo) does not report any problems on my PR.
  • I am willing to follow-up on review comments in a timely manner.
  • I checked all the boxes!

Breaking Change

Does your PR require Flutter developers to manually update their apps to accommodate your change?

  • No, this is not a breaking change.

@fluttergithubbot fluttergithubbot added the framework flutter/packages/flutter repository. See also f: labels. label Sep 26, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@darrenaustin darrenaustin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM :)

Copy link
Contributor

@darrenaustin darrenaustin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice, this does seem like a cleaner solution.

LGTM.

@gspencergoog gspencergoog merged commit eb3e2f5 into flutter:master Sep 27, 2019
gspencergoog added a commit to gspencergoog/flutter that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2019
…)"

This reverts commit eb3e2f5 because of a suspected analyzer bug.  Reverting to investigate.
gspencergoog added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2019
…41449)

This reverts commit eb3e2f5 because of a suspected analyzer bug.  Reverting to investigate.
gspencergoog added a commit to gspencergoog/flutter that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2019
gspencergoog added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2019
This re-lands #41417 with a slight change that will hopefully not tickle the analyzer as it did before. The last time I tried to land this, the analyzer succeeded for the analyze step in Cirrus, and locally, but failed in an integration test.
Inconnu08 pushed a commit to Inconnu08/flutter that referenced this pull request Sep 30, 2019
This addresses comments in the original PR (flutter#41245) that introduced Intent.doNothing, adds tests, and fixes an issue with it.
Inconnu08 pushed a commit to Inconnu08/flutter that referenced this pull request Sep 30, 2019
…)" (flutter#41449)

This reverts commit eb3e2f5 because of a suspected analyzer bug.  Reverting to investigate.
Inconnu08 pushed a commit to Inconnu08/flutter that referenced this pull request Sep 30, 2019
…1477)

This re-lands flutter#41417 with a slight change that will hopefully not tickle the analyzer as it did before. The last time I tried to land this, the analyzer succeeded for the analyze step in Cirrus, and locally, but failed in an integration test.
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 4, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
framework flutter/packages/flutter repository. See also f: labels.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants