jade is now called pug (trademark problem)-- we should probably fix it so flycheck works

[robbyoconnor]

I'm gonna take this on but is there a way to handle this in a way that doesn't break the current jade support?

[cpitclaudel]

I take it you're referring to pugjs/pug#2184?

@lunaryorn will confirm, but I think we can just add a separate pug checker to Flycheck with the same definition as the jade one (but predicated on pug-mode — I imagine that's what the Emacs mode will be renamed to). Once the pug→jade transition is complete we'll deprecate the jade checker.

We generally don't have too much compatibility stuff like this, but I'd vote for making an exception on this one given the exceptionally annoying process the Jade people are being forced to go through for silly reasons.

[swsnr]

@robbyoconnor Thank you for making us aware of this issue, but please provide more background information. We simply cannot follow all developments in all the languages that we support.

What is the current status of jade? Is it renamed already, with a proper release, or is the rename still ongoing? In how far does the renaming affect us other than that we need to rename the syntax checker? In how far would this break the current support for Jade? Does the renamed version also behave differently?

[robbyoconnor]

@lunaryorn -- as of right now the domain name is registered but the site is very much in progress-- the github org is migrated -- but the emacs major-mode is currently still jade-mode -- This doesn't look like it's gonna be a lot of work to do -- it's looking like more or less they just did a name change removing all traces of Jade/jade. I could fork the jade-mode and force the maintainers hand -- or wait until he does...honestly -- jade-mode works fine -- but flycheck is nice to have.

[swsnr]

@robbyoconnor I'm sorry but I'm still not sure in how far this affects us, nor why it could break Flycheck.

Presuming that pug still has the same CLI interface as jade, wouldn't it be sufficient to just rename the syntax checker to pug, make it run pug instead of jade and add a (yet to come?) pug-mode to its :modes?

That's something we could do as soon as the tool is officially renamed, though not before, to avoid confusion.

[robbyoconnor]

That is one option but there is still code out there that's running jade -- or completely unaware this happened. That is my concern...I mean currently it's broken for one group regardless

[swsnr]

@robbyoconnor What's the status of this?

[robbyoconnor]

I was waiting to hear back on what I should do...supporting both sounds
like a lot of work...maybe I'll just support pug?

--Rob
Sent from my cell, please excuse any typos.
On Jun 2, 2016 2:18 PM, "Sebastian Wiesner" notifications@github.com
wrote:

@robbyoconnor https://github.com/robbyoconnor What's the status of this?

—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#951 (comment),
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AABaMF4H6D4zO7kYhUnsH9NQ5WoIs07rks5qHx5ogaJpZM4ITVAQ
.

[swsnr]

Ah sorry. Yes, well only support pug imho. Let's keep things simple ☺️

Is the rename complete already?

[robbyoconnor]

I believe so -- give me a couple day? I'll reference this issue in my PR
On 06/02/2016 05:08 PM, Sebastian Wiesner wrote:

Ah sorry. Yes, well only support pug imho. Let's keep things simple ☺️

Is the rename complete already?

—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#951 (comment), or
mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AABaMPPo2dUL7jeVMiyIbLP_MDt-zvb6ks5qH0ZngaJpZM4ITVAQ.

[cpitclaudel]

@robbyoconnor Perfect, thanks!

[swsnr]

@robbyoconnor Any news here? Did you get a chance to work on renaming Jade to Pug in Flycheck?

[nickmccurdy]

Pug 2 was released in August, which I believe is the first official renamed release. I'm also interesting in progress on this, does anyone want help?

[robbyoconnor]

I'll do this tonight. Sorry folks -- resigned from a role that sucked the life out of me -- gonna move on this! Sorry all.

[nickmccurdy]

No rush. 😄 I was just curious if you guys were aware of the release, I think it was a prerelease for a while.

[cpitclaudel]

Thanks @robbyoconnor :) And good luck with work! No apologies needed.

[robbyoconnor]

Still testing, will make a PR after I'm sure this works. We should also look into adding pug-lint support, I'm willing to take this on in a separate PR.