Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding file extensions to gitattributes file for better diff #10946

Closed
Rafi993 opened this issue Oct 20, 2020 · 1 comment · Fixed by #10945
Closed

Adding file extensions to gitattributes file for better diff #10946

Rafi993 opened this issue Oct 20, 2020 · 1 comment · Fixed by #10945
Assignees

Comments

@Rafi993
Copy link
Contributor

Rafi993 commented Oct 20, 2020

Describe the bug

Adding file extensions to .gitattributes file for better diff. This issue is mostly inspired by https://tekin.co.uk/2020/10/better-git-diff-output-for-ruby-python-elixir-and-more

Additional context
Git recognises file type better if file extensions are mapped to languages for some languages like ruby. This results in better diff https://tekin.co.uk/2020/10/better-git-diff-output-for-ruby-python-elixir-and-more

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the issue! We'll take your request into consideration and follow up if we decide to tackle this issue.

To our amazing contributors: issues labeled type: bug are always up for grabs, but for feature requests, please wait until we add a ready for dev before starting to work on it.

To claim an issue to work on, please leave a comment. If you've claimed the issue and need help, please ping @forem/oss and we will follow up within 3 business days.

For full info on how to contribute, please check out our contributors guide.

@Rafi993 Rafi993 changed the title Adding file extensions to gitattributes file for better dif Adding file extensions to gitattributes file for better diff Oct 20, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants