New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Change the implementation of Backend/Core/Engine/Csv away from spoon library #2099

Open
carakas opened this Issue Jun 14, 2017 · 4 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
3 participants
@carakas
Member

carakas commented Jun 14, 2017

Type

  • Enhancement

Problem description

We are using Spoon csv, since spoon is deprecated we should swap it out

Expected behavior / Proposed solutions

Keep the same external api but let it work on a different library or implementation

@carakas carakas added this to the 5.0.0 milestone Jun 14, 2017

@carakas carakas added the RFC label Jun 14, 2017

@carakas

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@carakas

carakas Jun 14, 2017

Member

Suggestions welcome on what we should use instead

Member

carakas commented Jun 14, 2017

Suggestions welcome on what we should use instead

@jonasdekeukelaere

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
Contributor

jonasdekeukelaere commented Jun 14, 2017

@carakas

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@carakas

carakas Jun 14, 2017

Member

In that case I would wait since fork 5 will ship with symfony 3 because 2.8 will be EOL in the near future so it would be strange to ship with that version see #1989

Member

carakas commented Jun 14, 2017

In that case I would wait since fork 5 will ship with symfony 3 because 2.8 will be EOL in the near future so it would be strange to ship with that version see #1989

@carakas carakas self-assigned this Aug 1, 2017

@carakas

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@carakas

carakas Aug 1, 2017

Member

if this can be implemented in a BC way it can be done in 5.1 else it wil be 6

Member

carakas commented Aug 1, 2017

if this can be implemented in a BC way it can be done in 5.1 else it wil be 6

@carakas carakas removed the Nice to have 5 label Aug 1, 2017

@carakas carakas removed their assignment Aug 1, 2017

@carakas carakas modified the milestones: 5.1.0, 5.0.0 Aug 1, 2017

@carakas carakas modified the milestones: 5.1.0, 5.2.0 Jan 23, 2018

@carakas carakas added Easy Pick and removed RFC labels Jan 23, 2018

@StijnVrolijk StijnVrolijk modified the milestones: 5.2.0, 5.3.0 Feb 9, 2018

@carakas carakas modified the milestones: 5.3.0, 5.3.1, 5.4.0 May 28, 2018

@carakas carakas modified the milestones: 5.4.0, 5.5.0 Aug 6, 2018

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment