Fix equality operator arguments #6
Closed
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
...which avoids overload resolution ambiguities in C++20, when a synthesized
candidate of operator == for a reversed-argument rewrite conflicts with the
actual operator ==, as one is a template specialization for int and the other
for float. (As observed with recent Clang 10 trunk with -std=c++2a when
building libstaroffice as part of LibreOffice:
)