Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Suggested changes to Code of Conduct #65

Open
TylerRadford opened this issue Mar 26, 2018 · 21 comments
Open

Suggested changes to Code of Conduct #65

TylerRadford opened this issue Mar 26, 2018 · 21 comments

Comments

@TylerRadford
Copy link

Code of Conduct

Suggesting changes related to Rory McCann's email to diversity-talk OSM list.

Change from
FOSS4G is dedicated to providing a harassment-free conference experience for everyone, regardless of gender, sexual orientation, disability, physical appearance, body size, race, or religion. We do not tolerate harassment of conference participants in any form.

Change to
FOSS4G is dedicated to providing a harassment-free conference experience for everyone, regardless of gender, disability, physical appearance, body size, race, or religion. We do not tolerate harassment of conference participants in any form. While conference organizers will make every attempt to provide a welcoming experience for those of all sexual orientations and gender identities, not all incidents may be actionable due to local law in Tanzania.

Change from
6. If everyone is presently physically safe, involve law enforcement or security only at a victim's request.

Change to
6. If everyone is presently physically safe, involve law enforcement or security only at a victim's request. Do not report any attendees, friends, and family to the police for LGBTQ activity.

Change from
Once something is reported at least two of Caitlin, Guido, Ashley and Michael should meet. The main objectives of this meeting is to find out the following:

Change to
Once something is reported at least two of the event coordinators should meet. The main objectives of this meeting is to find out the following:

@amandasaurus
Copy link

Hi, I wrote the original email.


First bit looks good. I suggest mentioning this in more places as well. Your front page still implies it all totally safe.


Change from
6. If everyone is presently physically safe, involve law enforcement or security only at a victim's request.

Change to
6. If everyone is presently physically safe, involve law enforcement or security only at a victim's request. Do not report any attendees, friends, and family to the police for LGBTQ activity.

This isn't quite what I meant. This section of the CoC is about what the staff should do to handle an incident, and by putting that section there, it implies that this police prohibition only applies to conference staff. I suggest that any attendee reporting any other attendee to the police for LGBTQ activity/advocacy should be against the CoC.

In theory, this is covered by "harassing". If attendee A is harassed by the police because of the actions of another attendee B, then that B has essentially harassed A on the LGBTQ grounds.

How about "Harassment includes ... inappropriate physical contact, unwelcome sexual attention, and reporting any other attendee, their friends or family, to the police for LGBTQ, same-sex, or gender non-conforming, activities or advocacy." This would apply to all attendees, including conference staff.


The last bit is nothing to do with what I raised, I presume you're just tidying up the document.

@mikelmaron
Copy link

@timlinux @markiliffe thoughts? who else should review these potential changes?

@timlinux
Copy link
Contributor

Hi. I don't have any specific thoughts on the proposed changes - I'm happy to defer to those that have thought this through. Ideally @TylerRadford should just finalise which changes I should make and then I will action it.

@Delawen
Copy link

Delawen commented Mar 28, 2018

I think the changes make sense. Did someone wake up the OSGeo CoC committee for advice? Going to send an email to the mailing list to see if we can get more people reviewing this.

@Delawen
Copy link

Delawen commented Mar 28, 2018

"Harassment includes ... inappropriate physical contact, unwelcome sexual attention, and reporting any other attendee, their friends or family, to the police for LGBTQ, same-sex, or gender non-conforming, activities or advocacy."

includes but not limited to. That's important. We can't cover the full list of things.

@Delawen
Copy link

Delawen commented Mar 28, 2018

" Do not report any attendees, friends, and family to the police for LGBTQ activity."

I would change that by:

" Do not report any attendees, friends, and family, let the conference organization know first as they know better the local laws and how to handle it."

It may be read as "we don't want troubles" but maybe with some rephrase I can't think about now can be seen as what it really is: the organization should handle and take care, not the individuals.

@amandasaurus
Copy link

@Delawen I think your changes result in the opposite of what I meant. I presume that'

Attendees should be allowed to call the police if they're a victim of something, and that shouldn't be a CoC violation. Some CoC have a blanket "don't call the police" rule, and that helps abusers.

Here, I'm talking only about the crime of homosexual activity (in Tanzania). As in: "Calling the police to report a fellow attendee is OK, unless you're reporting them to the police for homosexuality, and then that's a CoC violation".

The way you've worded it sounds like "Let the conference organisers know if there are any homosexuals in attendance. They know the local laws better and how to handle homosexuals".

@amandasaurus
Copy link

I'd suggest being much more explicit, esp for local attendees and writing: "LGBTQ, same-sex, , gender non-conforming, or homosexual activities or advocacy"

@markiliffe
Copy link
Contributor

Hi All, I've pinged the OSGeo list for their awareness on this. Give it a few days and we can finalise this while the broader work of the OSGeo diversity group continues.

@camerons
Copy link

camerons commented Apr 2, 2018

As an outsider reading this Code of Conduct, without knowing the Tanzania anti-LGBT laws, this CoC would seem strange in the way they are singling out LGBT. I think it would be useful to state up front what the legal situation is, and the limits to the FOSS4G committee's ability to enforce the CoC or protect delegates from local laws.

I think it would be good to have a statement noting something like:

  1. Participants should be mindful of LGBT local laws, which state ...

  2. Participants should behave respectfully toward locals of the country and dress and behave respectfully when in public. Appropriate dress involves ...

  3. While the OSGeo Foundation supports a safe conference environment and will apply whatever means at its disposal to support this (including removing people from the conference if needed), participants should be aware of the limit's of the FOSS4G committee's legal mandate to protect delegates.

@amandasaurus
Copy link

without knowing the Tanzania anti-LGBT laws, this CoC would seem strange in the way they are singling out LGBT

If I haven't mentioned something else, that doesn't mean I don't think it should be included. I started the conversation about LGBTQ issues, by all means, expand the conversation.

It's illegal to be gay in Tanzania. Like many places, it originates from British colonial laws. Tanzania has introduced new laws since then, and it's currently on an anti-homosexual crack down. I found lots of newspaper articles from the last ~6 months. CoCs should be explicit, so "don't report people for homosexuality"[1] is an example of harassment. This also communicates your awareness of the issue to LGBTQ attendees.


My biggest issue is the organizers referring to (thinking?) this event is a "safe space [for LGBTQ people]", or that "all are welcome". Plenty of LGBTQ people holiday Dar es Salaam (I've done it, twice!), it's possible, you just must act closeted. But that's different from a safe space!

It's embarrassing to say "Oops, we made a mistake, this isn't safe" but if an attendee does or says the wrong thing in the wrong place, there could be horrible, horrible consequences. The CoC is prominently displayed on your website, implying you're in the new breed of conferences which take harassment seriously. Please, don't mislead people.


Expansion of @camerons's suggestion:

Participants should be mindful of LGBT local laws, which make any same sex activity (or promotion) illegal. Pretend to be straight and cis, especially if you need to interact with the police.

Participants should behave respectfully toward locals of the countryand dress and behave respectfully when in public. Appropriate dress involves [...]. Public displays of homosexuality like holding hands or kissing in public places could lead to arrest and imprisonment[3]

While the OSGeo Foundation supports a safe conference environment andwill apply whatever means at its disposal to support this (including
removing people from the conference if needed), participants should be
aware of the limit's of the FOSS4G committee's ability to protect
delegates when it comes to issues around sexuality or gender identity.


[1] I use "homosexual" here because that's what the laws and media in Tanzania use. But I mean all non-cis, non-hetero people. Many might not know what "We're pro-LGBTQ rights" means, but "We promote homosexuality"[2] might be clearer in a Tanzanian context?

[2] Yes, no-one is really "promoting" just one sexuality. But that's often what any acceptance of LGBTQ issues is called. e.g. the UK's Section 28 law (repealed 13 months before OSM started, and a few months after USA decriminalized homosexuality![4]) banned schools "promoting homosexuality". Teachers could only speak negatively about LGBTQ issues, and some took it to mean they couldn't interfere in homophobic bullying(!).

[3] I am wary about calling "don't act gay" as "behave respectfully". I don't know better phrasing.

@markiliffe
Copy link
Contributor

@rory @Delawen @TylerRadford @mikelmaron I've tried as best I can to harmonise these comments into an amended Code of Conduct. It is here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1k_zWD2dnMg0T-EhA2l828xkLxGyMHpLOuc0WxB5vfkM/edit?usp=sharing. I have also shared this through the FOSS4G mailing lists - I suggest HOT does the same for us to get this as far and wide as possible.

@amandasaurus
Copy link

That looks good to me. You're giving clear advice to LGBTQ people about the local situtation, you're telling them what to do (& not do). The sentence about the opinions of OSGeo is good, I never for a moment thought you directly supported these kinds of laws BTW. It's good that you copied a CoC which details staff handling guidelines.

You've put the "don't report LGBTQ activity" in the rules for staff handling, not in general list of harassment for all attendees.


Unrelated: You say 911 is the phone number for the police. Is that right? Wikipedia tells me it's 999. GSM mobile phones have a standard that 112 goes to the local emergency services number.

@TylerRadford
Copy link
Author

TylerRadford commented Apr 9, 2018 via email

@markiliffe
Copy link
Contributor

@rory, I've taken another pass and incorporated yours and the OSGeo community's suggestions/comments as best as I can. @TylerRadford over to you!

@litlplastkastl
Copy link

  • In line 97, I would add Gender Identity or Gender Expression

Very good job in protecting the victim and ensuring their integrity i case they do face this situation.

@markiliffe
Copy link
Contributor

markiliffe commented Apr 10, 2018

@litlplastkastl can you help identify where that line is please? Thanks!! In the doc, it reads as "If there is an immediately dangerous situation, do not hesitate to call 112 (Tanzanian police emergency) first". I'm unsure this is what is intended!

@litlplastkastl
Copy link

I was looking at the code for the document. The paragraphy with the suggestion is as follows "
FOSS4G is dedicated to providing a
harassment-free conference experience for
everyone, regardless of gender,
gender identity or gender expression,
sexual
orientation, disability, physical appearance,
body size, race, or religion. We do not
tolerate harassment of conference participants
in any form."

@markiliffe
Copy link
Contributor

@timlinux can you reflect the CoC onto the FOSS4G website please? I'll keep this ticket open to be indicative of its status as a living document.

@timlinux
Copy link
Contributor

timlinux commented May 8, 2018

Website was update a couple of weeks ago, leaving this ticket in idle mode

@litlplastkastl
Copy link

litlplastkastl commented May 8, 2018 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

8 participants