Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SPDX coverage from FOSSology project #1309

mcjaeger opened this issue Mar 19, 2019 · 1 comment


None yet
2 participants
Copy link

commented Mar 19, 2019


This is a meta issue for summarizing what are current not supported corners of the SPDX standard not covered by FOSSology so far. It shall bring transparency -- please fee free to add points to this.

Individual Issues Covered by the SPDX spec

  • SPDX Comments: #645
  • Import tag_value SPDX (not RDF ony), file matching #669
  • Support for full SPDX license expressions #687
  • no URL encoding of SPDX license names #747
  • individual license Ids in FOSSology are stupid #748 and #855
  • wrong SPDX license statements (repeating the same) #826
  • SPDX multi license statements not fully supported #972 and #997
  • SPDX new GPL identifier #1061

Individual Issues around SPDX

  • get SPDX #592
  • generate one SPDX for all uploads in a folder #1046
  • variants of licenses confuse the SPDX output #1073

@mcjaeger mcjaeger added this to the backlog milestone Mar 19, 2019


This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

commented May 29, 2019

Relevant also:

  • Change Nomos’ PHP-2.0.2 license (name) to PHP-2.02 #1213, where @muarachmann already volunteered to work on it.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
You can’t perform that action at this time.