New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
FreeBayes in RNA-seq #427
Comments
|
In it was claimed that @mjafin and others, freebayes should now handle the spliced reads. If this isn't the case please ping me over on the freebayes repo. The only problem I remember was during left alignment of indels. I don't have the commit I'd handy but I believe it has been resolved. Does it mean that it will handle correctly spliced reads without any pre-processing? Thanks, Anna |
|
May I resurface this issue, in case the OP or the devs have any input on this? I'm particularly interested in this last question:
Cheers |
|
I am interested as well! |
|
Me too. |
|
freebayes is in maintenance mode. But if anyone wants to work on RNAseq code feel free to reopen this issue. |
|
Hi @pjotrp. I appreciate that freebayes is in maintenance mode. However I don't think this is an enhancement issue. This issue is merely a request for clarification. The functionality described in this issue may already exist. We would really just like to know if it does. |
How would I reopen this issue? |
|
Id also be keen to know this @winni2k |
Hi,
in a previous thread I noticed that FreeBayes does not to work well with RNA-Seq data. I am in the process of comparing different tools for RNA-Seq variant calling and I was wondering if it is now ok to use it and especially what type of pre-processing it requires (any from the GATK best practices?).
Thanks,
Anna
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: