Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Get ports tree of the current pkgng repository #328

Closed
s-tlk opened this issue Aug 16, 2012 · 5 comments
Closed

Get ports tree of the current pkgng repository #328

s-tlk opened this issue Aug 16, 2012 · 5 comments

Comments

@s-tlk
Copy link

s-tlk commented Aug 16, 2012

As suggested here: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2012-August/069184.html
it would be nice to get the ports tree where the currently used repository is based on, so you can compile your custom software with the ports system.
Three suggestions for implementation:

  1. Create a package in the repository containing the ports tree.
  2. Add a mechanism to portsnap to fetch the correct tar ball, possible located at the same location of the repo.
  3. Add meta data to the repository containing the svn revision number of the ports tree, and then check it out per subversion.
@bapt
Copy link
Member

bapt commented Aug 28, 2012

Will be for 1.1

@s-tlk
Copy link
Author

s-tlk commented Aug 29, 2012

Hi,
that would be great. :)
Thank you very much.

Greetings
Michael

On Tue, 28 Aug 2012, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:

Will be for 1.1


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#328 (comment)

@bdrewery bdrewery self-assigned this Jun 17, 2014
@bdrewery
Copy link
Member

I have this mostly implemented

@bsdlme
Copy link
Contributor

bsdlme commented Nov 6, 2015

Any news on this?

@bapt
Copy link
Member

bapt commented Dec 3, 2020

This is actually not up to pkg to deal with this, but up to the ports tree or anything in freebsd's infrastructure, no need to track this here.

@bapt bapt closed this as completed Dec 3, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants