Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 5, 2024. It is now read-only.

[securedrop-proxy] Consider using requests module #129

Closed
kushaldas opened this issue Sep 24, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

[securedrop-proxy] Consider using requests module #129

kushaldas opened this issue Sep 24, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@kushaldas
Copy link
Contributor

Currently we are building HTTP request objects manually in the codebase, and then using that to do HTTP calls. We should consider using Python requests module instead as it the most consumed Python module outside of the standard library.

@sssoleileraaa
Copy link
Contributor

[Backlog pruning, 5/16] Endpoint specific code could be generated in the SDK, but since this is a smaller issue and helps with standardization in the meantime (the endpoint refactor hasn't been planned for anytime soon) we're keeping this open.

@zenmonkeykstop zenmonkeykstop changed the title Consider using requests module [securedrop-proxy] Consider using requests module Dec 13, 2023
@zenmonkeykstop zenmonkeykstop transferred this issue from freedomofpress/securedrop-proxy Dec 13, 2023
@legoktm
Copy link
Member

legoktm commented Dec 13, 2023

The proxy has been using the requests module for quite a while now.

@legoktm legoktm closed this as completed Dec 13, 2023
@zenmonkeykstop zenmonkeykstop transferred this issue from freedomofpress/securedrop-client Dec 13, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants