Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create relative symbol links #189

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

tiran
Copy link
Member

@tiran tiran commented Oct 26, 2016

Instead of absolute symbolic links to /usr/bin/COMMAND the RPM spec now
creates relative symbolic links.

Signed-off-by: Christian Heimes cheimes@redhat.com

Instead of absolute symbolic links to /usr/bin/COMMAND the RPM spec now
creates relative symbolic links.

Signed-off-by: Christian Heimes <cheimes@redhat.com>
@rcritten
Copy link
Contributor

I think you should add the reasoning for switching the link type to the commit message and if this is related to some higher-level ticket that should be included as well.

@tiran
Copy link
Member Author

tiran commented Oct 26, 2016

I ran into some strange issues while I was working on PR #188. The symlinks were both dangling symlinks and pointed to a directory that my user could not write to. Eventually I found the real culprit. I still think that relative symlinks are better. Python generally uses relative links for its aliases.

@pspacek
Copy link
Contributor

pspacek commented Oct 27, 2016

As I said several times already, all the SPEC file logic is going away. I'm going to reject this as we do not need to change code which is going away and force everybody to rebase.

@pspacek pspacek self-assigned this Oct 27, 2016
@pspacek pspacek added the rejected Pull Request has been rejected label Oct 27, 2016
@tiran tiran closed this Oct 27, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
rejected Pull Request has been rejected
Projects
None yet
3 participants