Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Belts with Asteroid Reformation Processor under blockage do not count as connected to it #2215

Closed
Oberlus opened this issue Jul 15, 2018 · 1 comment

Comments

@Oberlus
Copy link

commented Jul 15, 2018

  • FreeOrion Version: build 2018-07-13.9a03676 MSCV 2015 (0.4.8 RC2, binary release)
  • Operating System: Windows 7

Description

An asteroid belt colonised with exobots and equiped with Asteroid Processor (AP) and Asteroid Reformation Processor (ARP) was building scattered asteroid hulls. Once the system has got blockaded by an Enemy, the asteriod belt fails to meet the building requirements, which is wrong. Check attached image
fo_cant_built_asteroid_hulls_on_belts
I've checked that asteroid hulls with the AP requirement (and not ARP) are available to be built in that same asteroid belt, and that the ARP counts as present in the asteroid belt (can't build a second one because it does not meet the requirement "there is no ARP in the planet"). I don't see why the FOCS code could be failing here.

Expected Result

The hull should be allowed in the asteroid belt under blockage, since it has all required buildings. More specifically, the building requirements should be acknowledge as met, which are not.

Steps to reproduce

Load attached save game. Check system Adhil Gamma. Check the items being built in Adhil Gamma Asteroids. There is a batch of 1 "Swarm Carrier" about to be finished. It's due date is "never". If you check the unavailable ship designs you'll see the "Swarm Carrier" design there, the asteroid belt fails to meet the Asteroid Reformation Processor building requirement, while it is actually built in that asteroid belt.

FreeOrion_Sicofonte_Shy_0238_20180715_131612.zip

@Dilvish-fo

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

commented Jul 15, 2018

verified, and I think I see the problem, I am working on it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
You can’t perform that action at this time.