Conversation
|
definitely. what does your JSON object look like on disk at the moment? This looks good to me, the other three changes/additions that I can think of in my version at the moment are:
If you don’t have any problem with adding these, I can synthesize them as a PR from my version to here. |
|
Just had a play around with your version. I think we need to disambiguate fields a bit. My clips currently look like this {
"quote": "The text that is highlighted at time of clip",
"note": "The user-generated note that is typed at time of clip",
"time": 12321312311,
"tags": ["test", "example"],
"href": "https://baseurl.com/that-the-clip-comes-from"
}The server you have expects at least additional In my version of a clip, it's not necessarily sourced from a webpage (it could also be a DT document), and as such I think my
I think our treatment of |
|
I also like how your server groups clips according to matching |
|
One final point is that I excised |
@breezykermo I kind of prefer the JSONL format since it's more compatible with some other tools I have, but exposing highlights as RSS is useful. This PR keeps JSONL as the main storage format but provides a feed at
/rss.xml. Would we be able to combine our changes in some way?