Permalink
Browse files

[posts] Fix Terminal Coloring pictures

  • Loading branch information...
frozencemetery committed Sep 26, 2016
1 parent 955e52b commit dd1ac76c1bd4ca9d83cfc3192df6545aee819000
@@ -41,22 +41,18 @@ experiment. In the course of trying to fix the above problem, I had installed
xterm. I also installed a 256color build of urxvt and subsequently noticed
that urxvt and xterm (at least in emacs) don't handle 256colors the same way:

[<img src="http://mivehind.net/media/get-medium/0"
alt="xterm (256) versus urxvt-256" align=center />](http://mivehind.net/media/get-medium/0)
[![xterm (256) versus urxvt-256](/assets/2013-10-20-0.jpg)](/assets/2013-10-20-0.jpg)

Bizarre. Please note that these pictures are large; click on them for more
detail.

Anyway, for comparison's sake, here's a shot that includes 88-color urxvt:

[<img src="http://mivehind.net/media/get-medium/1"
alt="xterm (256) versus urxvt-88 and urxvt-256" align=center />](http://mivehind.net/media/get-medium/1)
[![xterm (256) versus urxvt-88 and urxvt-256](/assets/2013-10-20-1.jpg)](/assets/2013-10-20-1.jpg)

And one more, this time including a libvte emulator as well:

[<img src="http://mivehind.net/media/get-medium/2"
alt="xterm (256) versus xfce4-terminal (16 color, libvte) versus urxvt-88 versus urxvt-256"
align=center />](http://mivehind.net/media/get-medium/2)
[![xterm (256) versus xfce4-terminal (16 color, libvte) versus urxvt-88 versus urxvt0256](/assets/2013-10-20-2.jpg)](/assets/2013-10-20-2.jpg)

The emulator in question (xfce4-terminal) does support 256 colors, but
somewhere in the chain of termcaps and emulating xterm, that information is
Binary file not shown.
Binary file not shown.
Binary file not shown.

0 comments on commit dd1ac76

Please sign in to comment.