Handle silverlight framework identifiers comparison #1138
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
FrameworkIdentifier instances were compared structurally before but it was problematic in some cases as '>= net45' matched 'sl40' that wasn't in the same framework. Fixes fsprojects#1124
|
so is this already ready? |
|
very cool |
forki
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 15, 2015
Handle silverlight framework identifiers comparison
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Continue on & rebase #1130 (That was itself based on #1127)
I didn't keep the history because the back & forth was just making the pull request unreadable.
FrameworkRestriction.IsSameCategoryAswas introduced in addition to the version onFrameworkIdentifierto avoid repeating the checks over and over.