Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update ProjectFile.GetTargetProfile to work with conditional nodes #1227

merged 7 commits into from Nov 16, 2015


Copy link

amazingant commented Nov 16, 2015

Working on #1221 (cc/ @theggelund and @forki), the contents of the test file I changed in 73e6f8c appear to work as of b905c75.

The output looks correct to me, but I'll need one of you to confirm, as I'm not sure what the output from the paket_bug project is supposed to be. Just testing from an fsx file like so:

#r @"bin\Paket.Core.dll"
let proj = Paket.ProjectFile.LoadFromFile @"tests\Paket.Tests\ProjectFile\TestData\ProjectWithConditions.fsprojtest"
let profile = proj.GetTargetProfile()

profile outputs as SinglePlatform (DotNetFramework V4_6). If I change the TargetFrameworkProfile node's condition to check for framework v4.6 instead, then I get SinglePlatform (DotNetFramework V4_Client). Doesn't make sense since there isn't a client profile for 4.6 (that I know of?), but shows that the condition on the node is being evaluated.

amazingant added 7 commits Nov 16, 2015
Gets the specified property name from the project, evaluating
conditional PropertyGroup nodes as best it can and processing
MSBuild placeholder values, e.g. `$(Configuration)`
Did this by renaming the old member to GetPropertyWithDefaults, and
adding a new member with the old name; new member passes
Map.empty<string,string> to the WithDefaults member.
If a <TargetFrameworkProfile> value can be extracted from the project
file and it has a value, that value is used to determine the profile
here. If that node isn't specified, or its value is empty,
GetTargetProfile now tries to get the <TargetFrameworkVersion> node to
determine the correct profile from there.

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

forki commented Nov 16, 2015

this looks good to me. In debugger I see that the files are copiec twice - but the correct files. So it works as expected!


@forki forki merged commit 9ef7828 into fsprojects:master Nov 16, 2015
2 checks passed
2 checks passed
continuous-integration/appveyor/pr AppVeyor build succeeded
continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build passed
forki added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 16, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
None yet
2 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.