If we weaken the \$->$\ embroidery to $\(\=0)$ and the \$->$\ embroidery to $\(\=0)$, as in \figref{loparallelismdisabused}, we have \ stability in the sender, since neither of those embroideries mentions the other assignment's variable. But now have external instability in the receiver. The \$->$\ embroidery is now unstable against both lines of the sender's guarantee. Here's the \interferenced{\(\=0)}{\:=1} case: \begin{equation} \cols & \((\=1=>\=0)@\(\=0),\;\:=1) \\ = & (\=1=>\=0)@\hook{\(\=0)}@\=0@\=1 \\ \not=> & \!=1|\=0 \\ \sloc %DIF < \eqnlabel{label} \end{equation} %DIF > \eqnlabel{label} \DIFaddbegin \end{equation} \DIFaddend The \$->$\ \DIFdelbegin \DIFdel{embroidery, which prevented the receiver from reading }\DIFdelend \DIFaddbegin \DIFadd{embroidery, which prevented the receiver from reading }\DIFaddend $\=1$ when $\=1$\DIFdelbegin \DIFdel{, is unstable against }\DIFdelend \DIFaddbegin \DIFadd{, is unstable against }\DIFaddend \interferenced{\(\=0)}{\:=1}: \DIFdelbegin %DIFDELCMD < \begin{equation} %DIFDELCMD < \cols %DIFDELCMD < & %%% \DIFdel{\((\=1=>\=1@\=0)@\(\=0),\;\:=1) }%DIFDELCMD < \\ %DIFDELCMD < %%% \DIFdel{= }%DIFDELCMD < & %%% \DIFdel{(\=1=>\=1@\=0)@}%DIFDELCMD < \hook{\(\=0)}%%% \DIFdel{@\=0@\=1 }%DIFDELCMD < \not%%% \DIFdel{=> }%DIFDELCMD < & %%% \DIFdel{\!=1|\=1@\=0 }%DIFDELCMD < \sloc %DIFDELCMD < %%% %DIF < \eqnlabel{label} \end{equation} \DIFdelend \DIFaddbegin \begin{equation} \DIFadd{\cols }& \DIFadd{\((\=1=>\=1@\=0)@\(\=0),\;\:=1) }\\ \DIFadd{= }& \DIFadd{(\=1=>\=1@\=0)@\hook{\(\=0)}@\=0@\=1 \not=> }& \DIFadd{\!=1|\=1@\=0 \sloc %DIF > \eqnlabel{label} }\end{equation} \DIFaddend