New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allow switching tool versions in workflow editor #4373
Merged
martenson
merged 15 commits into
galaxyproject:dev
from
mvdbeek:switch_versions_in_workflows
Aug 15, 2017
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
15 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
5f1b7d5
Show verison button in workflow editor and trigger on_change
mvdbeek 25e05b6
Do postchange action only when modifiying tool versions in the workfl…
mvdbeek 5afe490
Fix qunit test
mvdbeek 36ce911
Keep spacing consistent (thx @nsoranzo)
mvdbeek 526e98e
Reset outputs when changing tool versions in wf-editor
mvdbeek db2ea85
Now thing are mostly working -- input and output connections are corr…
mvdbeek ea1f4f8
Fix the occasional loading of the wrong workflow. Turns out that some…
mvdbeek bc95f5e
Now adding/removing datasets and multiple version switches work fine,…
mvdbeek 92fedc0
Fix logic for adding and removing outputs
mvdbeek 1c286b1
Remove extra newlines
mvdbeek 2e95026
Remove unused old_version variable
mvdbeek 31c423a
Fix typo and remove leftover comment (thanks @nsoranzo)
mvdbeek df91881
Remove unused workflow outputs
mvdbeek 73f4141
Add static JS
mvdbeek aa7be28
Merge branch 'dev' into switch_versions_in_workflows
martenson File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This should be moved out of the base class. I can help with this tho. Is this PR already functional?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not entirely, I'm still struggling with getting the connections right when the number and type of output changes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@guerler I think this is fully functional now, but I'm sure there are some optimizations to do. Feel free to push to this branch if you want.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@guerler Do you object to me merging as is so you can follow up with that change - or do you want this change made first?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @mvdbeek. Yeah I can make those changes later.