Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Project Governance #316

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Oct 7, 2015
Merged

Project Governance #316

merged 2 commits into from Oct 7, 2015

Conversation

@jmchilton
Copy link
Member

@jmchilton jmchilton commented Oct 7, 2015

  • Replace Planemo Code of Conducts with Galaxy's for consistency and because @tnabtaf is a better point person than me.
  • Add a project governance document (tl;dr @jmchilton can do whatever he wants until someone cool asks him to stop).
jmchilton added 2 commits Oct 7, 2015
I prefer Planemo's but I have repeatedly argued that consistency is better than perfection.

Switching contact person from me (John Chilton) to Dave Clements because lets be honest he is much less likely to offend or make someone uncomfortable than me.
Update: Rebased with changes suggested by @mvdbeek.
@jmchilton jmchilton force-pushed the jmchilton:coc branch 2 times, most recently from c95a34a to bc04e9c Oct 7, 2015

This Code of Conduct is adapted from the `khmer Contributor Code of Conduct
<https://github.com/ged-lab/khmer/blob/master/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.rst>`__.
Galaxy Project Code of Conduct

This comment has been minimized.

@nsoranzo

nsoranzo Oct 7, 2015
Member

s/Galaxy/Planemo/ ?

This comment has been minimized.

@jmchilton

jmchilton Oct 7, 2015
Author Member

Oh come on it is the title of the document so I'm not super impressed by that catch 🐦 👀, find something more subtle! 😄

@jmchilton jmchilton force-pushed the jmchilton:coc branch from bc04e9c to c778093 Oct 7, 2015
@natefoo
Copy link
Member

@natefoo natefoo commented Oct 7, 2015

"Benevolent" may not be the correct adjective... ;D

@jmchilton
Copy link
Member Author

@jmchilton jmchilton commented Oct 7, 2015

@natefoo Say it with a great deal of sarcasm and you will realize it fits just about perfectly.

transparent in decision making processes and request comment and build
consensus whenever possible.

The BDFN position does not exist because there is not a desire to have open

This comment has been minimized.

@mvdbeek

mvdbeek Oct 7, 2015
Member

How about:
The BDFN position only exists because the developers of the project believe it is currently too small to support full and open governance at this time. In order to ...
Less double negatives, shorter, easier to understand?

@mvdbeek
Copy link
Member

@mvdbeek mvdbeek commented Oct 7, 2015

I like it. 👍

@jmchilton jmchilton force-pushed the jmchilton:coc branch from c778093 to e4d35b5 Oct 7, 2015
@dannon
Copy link
Member

@dannon dannon commented Oct 7, 2015

+1

@jmchilton jmchilton force-pushed the jmchilton:coc branch 2 times, most recently from e9bda0a to 798bd5b Oct 7, 2015
@jmchilton
Copy link
Member Author

@jmchilton jmchilton commented Oct 7, 2015

Tweaked wording a couple times based on @mvdbeek's suggestions and rebased.

@jmchilton
Copy link
Member Author

@jmchilton jmchilton commented Oct 7, 2015

Ping - I'd explicitly like a 👍 from @peterjc and @erasche before this is merged.

@bgruening
Copy link
Member

@bgruening bgruening commented Oct 7, 2015

Finally it's written, John is the benevolent dictator!
👍

@peterjc
Copy link
Contributor

@peterjc peterjc commented Oct 7, 2015

+1

@hexylena
Copy link
Member

@hexylena hexylena commented Oct 7, 2015

👍 from me, all hail the benevolent dictator.

@jmchilton
Copy link
Member Author

@jmchilton jmchilton commented Oct 7, 2015

Awesome sauce, thanks all!

jmchilton added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 7, 2015
Project Governance
@jmchilton jmchilton merged commit 1e7f052 into galaxyproject:master Oct 7, 2015
1 check passed
1 check passed
continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build passed
Details
@jmchilton jmchilton deleted the jmchilton:coc branch Oct 7, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

8 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.