Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mark as deprecated at usegalaxy.org: Velvet[h|g] and VelvetOptimiser (all versions) #321

Closed
jennaj opened this issue Dec 21, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@jennaj
Copy link
Member

@jennaj jennaj commented Dec 21, 2020

Notice for end-users: Upgrade to SPAdes for analysis purposes

Velvet related tools are older, and some have datatype requirements that differ from more current tools. Some users have reported that earlier versions of these tools (the same version as included in the GTN tutorials they are following) work fine, so that may be an option if you really want to follow an existing GTN tutorial (linked below).

  • Avoid Velvetg and Velveth when possible. If used for training, and fastq inputs are involved, these must be assigned the datatype fastq. Input with the datatypefastqsanger will fail. Medium to large assemblies will fail for resources.
  • Use VelvetOptimiser for training purposes only. This tool does accept inputs with the fastqsanger datatype. Medium to large assemblies will fail for resources.

GTN tutorials: https://training.galaxyproject.org/training-material/topics/assembly/

Admin changes per @mschatz

  1. Tag each of the three tools as deprecated (all versions)
  2. Move into the "Deprecated/Assembly" section of the tool panel at usegalaxy.org
  3. Prevent any future updates from removing the "deprecated" tags or moving the tool panel placement ongoing

Reported to galaxy-bugs mailing list, and at Galaxy Help: https://help.galaxyproject.org/t/galaxy-error-using-velveth-error-deprecated-tool-suite-try-spades-instead/5050.

@jennaj
Copy link
Member Author

@jennaj jennaj commented Dec 22, 2020

Those three tools show up with the deprecated tag now. Are under the Assembly tool group. I think that is fine. Thank you both!

Loading

@jennaj jennaj closed this Dec 22, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

None yet
3 participants