Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Prepare merge #1

Closed
wants to merge 71 commits into from
Closed

Prepare merge #1

wants to merge 71 commits into from

Conversation

gallais
Copy link
Owner

@gallais gallais commented Dec 2, 2021

I'm giving up on the subtle approach and

  1. renaming back all the idris2 -> idris via sed
  2. merging the resulting files

This won't preserve the history of the patches but trying to do so creates

  1. a lot of conflicts
  2. a lot of empty commits because some patches have been essentially cherry-picked (and yet still create merge conflicts)

redfish64 and others added 30 commits May 24, 2020 09:40
Fixed make-lemma
Added jump-to-def

TODO
2
get evil leader working again
proof search next
add jump-to-def next
3
load-forward-line and load-backward-line. These are for "load-to-here"
functionality to execute a partial file
... probably a lot more... Newbie to Idris, elisp and proving things
choose. Also handles source files missing more gracefully.
isn't on a symbol when invoked.
Created idris2-jump-to-def-same-window which is the same as
idris2-jump-to-def, but will use the existing window when jumping to the
new file position.
specified in customization. Did some whocall stuff (not implemented in
Idris2 currently)
idris2-sources looking for source. Added xref pushes for who-calls
changes which I were made so long ago I don't remember what they were
for anymore.
And also revert some of the deletions made in idris2-mode.
These should never have been stubbed out: it's Idris2's role to
handle even commands that have not been implemented yet.
idris-thing-at-point is nowadays happy to open a prompt
@aeonik
Copy link

aeonik commented Nov 24, 2023

Did this ever get merged back into idris-mode?

idris-hackers#546

I am a bit confused which mode to use.

I commented on an issue in the Doom Emacs repository that you can find here:
doomemacs/doomemacs#7229

@gallais
Copy link
Owner Author

gallais commented Nov 24, 2023

These days I'm using idris-mode. Merging back would be too much work I think so I have given up on the idea.

@gallais gallais closed this Nov 24, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants