Skip to content
FuzixOS: Because Small Is Beautiful
Branch: master
Clone or download
Pull request Compare This branch is 4916 commits behind EtchedPixels:master.
Fetching latest commit…
Cannot retrieve the latest commit at this time.
Permalink
Type Name Latest commit message Commit time
Failed to load latest commit information.
Applications
Kernel
Library
Standalone
.gitignore
LICENCE
README.md

README.md

FuzixOS: Because Small Is Beautiful

This is the initial public tree for the FuzixOS project. It is not yet useful although you can build and boot it and run test application code. A lot of work is needed on the utilities and libraries.

FUZIX

FUZIX is a fusion of various elements from the assorted UZI forks and branches beaten together into some kind of semi-coherent platform and then extended from V7 to somewhere in the SYS3 to SYS5.x world with bits of POSIX thrown in for good measure. Various learnings and tricks from ELKS and from OMU also got blended in

What does FUZIX have over UZI

  • Support for multiple processes in banked memory (as per UZI180) but with Minix style chmem and efficient use of bank allocations.
  • Support for multiple processes via hard disk or non mappable RAM drive switching (as per UZI, UZIX).
  • The ability to run single tasking on small devices, for bring up and for standalone tool execution
  • Support for "real" swapping combined with banked memory.
  • Proper sane off_t and lseek
  • Normal dev_t
  • 30 character filenames
  • Proper sane time_t
  • System 5 signals (half baked)
  • Posix termios (does all the original UZI tty did but much can be added)
  • Blocking on carrier for terminals
  • Optimisations to avoid bogus uarea copying compared to UZI180
  • More modern system call API: 3 argument open, mkdir, rmdir, rename, chroot (with correct .. semantics), fchdir, fchmod, fchown, fstat, fcntl, setpgrp, sighold and friends, waitpid, setpgrp, nice O_NDELAY, O_CLOEXEC, F_SETFL, F_DUPFD etc
  • Address validation checks on all syscall copies
  • Builds with a modern ANSI C compiler (SDCC)
  • Kernel boots on both 6502, 6809 and Z80
  • Core code can be built for 6502, 6809, 68000, 8086 and Z80 so should be far more portable
  • Core architecture designed to support building and maintaining multiple target machines without forking each one
  • Helpers to make many bits of implementation wrappers to core code
  • Lots more bugs right now

What does UZI have over FUZIX

  • Can run in 64K of RAM (32K kernel/32K user). FUZIX would need banked ROM or similar to pull this off. If you have banked ROM then our kernel footprint in RAM is about 8K plus userspace plus any framebuffers and similar overhead. On a 6809 it's just about possible to run in a straight 64K

What do the UZI branches have that FUZIX has not yet integrated

  • Minimal TCP/IP (UZIX 2.0). Unfortunately the original TCP was never released openly.
  • Symbolic links (UZIX)
  • Various clever fusions of syscalls that may save a few bytes (UZIX)
  • setprio (UZIX)
  • Rather crude loadable drivers (UZIX)
  • Use of __naked and __asm for Z80 specific bits to avoid more .S files than are needed (UMZIX)

Plus OMU has a really clever function passing trick for open/creat and friends, while UMZIX has a neat unified "make anything" function.

What Key Features Are Missing Still

  • ptrace, core dumps, ulimit
  • root reserved disk blocks
  • banked executables
  • TCP/IP
  • select/poll()
  • Support for > 32MB filesystems (but first figure out how to fsck a giant fs on a slow 8bit micro!)
  • Uptime
  • Smarter scheduler
  • Optimisations for disk block/inode allocator (2.11BSD)
  • CP/M emulator has not yet been debugged on the FUZIX syscall API

Tool Issues

  • No useful 8086 compiler option (started work on pcc 8086 but help needed, coherent may provide a suitable cc but that also needs work)
  • 6809 gcc and cc65 don't have long long 64bit (for sane time_t)
  • SDCC can generate ROMmable binaries but not banked ones
  • SDCC has no register passing function call support, and for some stuff it really shows
  • SDCC generates quite bloaty small applications. Needs research on how to improve.
  • None of the above have an O88 style common sequence compressor

Platforms

  • Amstrad NC100/NC200 - real hardware sanity check
  • Amstrad PCW8256 - boots to loading init, floppy driver bugs to chase
  • Atari 520ST - 68000 core code build test only at this point
  • Dragon64 - abused as an emulator 6809 test environment (replaces all the system ROMs)
  • Dragon Nx32 - Dragon with Tormod's memory expansion card
  • Epson PX4/4Plus - WIP port to a very early Z80 laptop
  • Memotech MTX512 - boots to userspace in emulation, some small details need fixing to boot on real hardware
  • MSX - basic functionality
  • N8VEM-MarkIV - Supports the on-board RTC, RS232, RS422, IDE and SD interfaces, on the ECB expansion bus only the PropIO V2 serial port is supported at this time.
  • P112 - Supports the floppy disk controller, ESCC serial ports, and optional G-IDE interface.
  • SocZ80 - 128MHz extreme Z80 FPGA machine. Boots to shell, drivers need work
  • TGL6502 - Test 6502ish environment
  • TRS80 - boots to userspace in emulation, swapping, floppy and hard disc done
  • Z80Pack - used as a dev and test environment for both large swapping multiprocess and for small single tasking
  • Zeta v2 - initial port running to user space
  • ZX Spectrum 128K - can boot to shell but needs swap debugging to get further

Various other platforms are partly filled out to sanity check assumptions and start making progress on them. The main need there is now to tackle all the billion different ways of interfacing the floppy controllers.

You can’t perform that action at this time.