-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
feat: download/package OSV scanner and register as MCP server #105
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
🤖 Hi @capachino, I've received your request, and I'm working on it now! You can track my progress in the logs for more details. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
📋 Review Summary
This pull request significantly improves the release process by refactoring the packaging workflow to support multiple platforms (Linux, macOS, Windows) and dynamically downloading the OSV scanner. The separation of the build, package, and upload jobs is a great improvement for clarity and maintainability.
🔍 General Feedback
- The use of a matrix strategy for different platforms is well-implemented.
- Verifying the OSV scanner binary using
slsa-verifieris an excellent security measure. - I've added a couple of minor suggestions to improve the robustness of the shell scripts within the workflow.
Overall, this is a solid improvement to the project's release automation.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
📋 Security Analysis Summary
This Pull Request updates the release workflow to download and package the OSV scanner. The changes are well-structured and the use of SLSA verification for the downloaded binary is a great security practice.
🔍 General Feedback
- The use of
evalin the packaging step is a minor security concern. While not directly exploitable in its current form, it's recommended to replace it with a safer alternative to prevent potential issues in the future.
6b14f68 to
9ee9423
Compare
|
@gemini-cli /review |
|
🤖 Hi @capachino, I've received your request, and I'm working on it now! You can track my progress in the logs for more details. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
📋 Review Summary
This pull request introduces a new workflow to package and upload the OSV scanner as a release asset. The overall structure is good, with separate jobs for building, packaging, and uploading, and it includes security best practices like SLSA verification.
🔍 General Feedback
- The workflow is well-structured and easy to follow.
- The use of a matrix strategy for different platforms is efficient.
- Including SLSA verification for the downloaded binary is an excellent security measure.
- I found one critical issue in the packaging script that will affect the Windows release, which I've commented on directly.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No vulnerabilities were found in this pull request.
🔍 General Feedback
The changes in this pull request are well-structured and follow best practices. The use of slsa-verifier to verify the downloaded binary is a great security control.
9ee9423 to
4e93425
Compare
4e93425 to
eccf9eb
Compare
Makes progress on #25
Tested on my fork https://github.com/capachino/security/releases/tag/v0.1.0