GeneBe Hub RFCs published #4
Replies: 3 comments
-
|
First Round of the RFC is Over – Thank You! The first round of the RFC has officially concluded. A huge thank you to everyone who shared their ideas via private messages! Your input has been greatly appreciated. While this round is over, the discussion remains open—if you still have suggestions, feel free to send them. A summary of the first round will be shared soon. Stay tuned! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Conclusions so far:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
In order to be able to support many platforms to read GeneBeHub stored data there must be limits on the names of the fields and the database itself. The biggest common supported set of safe characters are |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Request for Comments: GeneBe Hub
TLDR;
Public, open repository for variant annotation databases is suggested, named GeneBe Hub. One can easily annotate VCF file with prepared databases. Repositry is open, you can publish your annotations there. There are 3 elements that builds the system:
We publish three RFC to discuss proposition, while the most important is the Format.
Summary
GeneBe Hub is an open, public repository of Genetic Variant Annotation Databases. It aims to provide a unified platform for sharing, discovering, and utilizing genetic variant annotations. By introducing a standardized format, repository and a client application for processing these annotations, GeneBe Hub addresses the challenges of inconsistency, lack of centralization, and complex application methods.
We are inviting the bioinformatics community to provide feedback on the proposed format, distribution methods, and application workflows to ensure GeneBe meets the needs of researchers, geneticists, and developers alike.
The first round of feedback collection will conclude on 21th February 2025.
Background
Challenges in Genetic Variant Annotation
Interpreting genetic variants requires extensive data. Before assigning pathogenicity to a variant, an expert must consider various factors, such as:
While numerous tools and databases address these aspects, the field lacks a universal standard for sharing, applying, and distributing variant annotations. Databases are often distributed in diverse formats (VCF, TSV, bigWig), making it challenging to parse and integrate them. Additionally, these databases are published in various locations, often making them difficult to find and explore. With continuously updated resources like ClinVar, keeping up-to-date with the latest data becomes increasingly complex for bioinformaticians.
Variant Annotation Distribution Challenge
There are hundreds of variant annotations available. If you are the author of a new variant scorer, frequency aggregator, or another type of variant annotation, getting it to users is not easy. You can publish your annotations on your website, submit a paper to a scientific journal, and... wait. But what format should you use? There is no standard yet. How can you make your annotation searchable and applicable?
You could develop an application that applies your annotations to VCF files, but will users actually download and use it? This challenge prevents many great annotations from gaining wider recognition—simply because they are difficult to discover and apply.
The GeneBe Solution
GeneBe Hub aims to solve these challenges by offering:
A Standardized Format
A Client Application
A Centralized Repository
Non-Goals
GeneBe Hub does not aim to:
Key Goals of this RFC
We are seeking community input on the following aspects:
1. Standardized Format
Please continue reading on Database Format RFC
2. Distribution via (not only) GeneBe Hub
Please continue reading on Public repository RFC
3. Application Methods / GeneBe Client
Please continue reading on GeneBe Client RFC
Feedback
We encourage all interested parties to:
Promotion
This RFC will also be promoted on Reddit, Biostars and other platforms to gather diverse perspectives. We value input from geneticists, bioinformaticians, software developers, and anyone engaged in the interpretation of genetic data. We would also be grateful for help in spreading the RFC.
Quick links:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions