New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
regulation by pattern #12976
Comments
Makes sense to me. |
Who would implement this pattern and fix existing terms? Can someone assess the scope by a clever query (terms and their current logical defs) and attach the results please? Perhaps not a manual, one-by-one job but done computationally? |
This makes sense to me too. I thought this was what @tberardini , @cmungall and I had agreed on before. I wonder how the others crept in. I remember there was some question about directionality of the inferences when we discussed this before, ie there was an issue about which process was the regulator and which was the target, so we should look carefully at that again. @cmungall do you remember? |
(see #12995 for precedent) |
related to #13166 |
"regulation of X by regulation of Y" terms follow a number of patterns,
e.g.
I think they should all follow the pattern:
'regulation of X' and regulates some Y
e.g.
The regulation of Y term is unnecessary as the pattern makes it an inferred superclass (see above).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: