From e133015a4f6fd9669d78ea19ff3478f009f593c3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matthew Wakefield Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2016 10:26:13 +1100 Subject: [PATCH] fix doi link --- README.md | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index 076df81..1aeaeda 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ [![Build Status](https://travis-ci.org/genomematt/xenomapper.svg?branch=master)](https://travis-ci.org/genomematt/xenomapper) [![Coverage Status](https://coveralls.io/repos/genomematt/xenomapper/badge.svg)](https://coveralls.io/r/genomematt/xenomapper) -[![JOSS](http://joss.theoj.org/papers/7065e20e97ff4e44695b5e9fef7cdcd8/status.svg)](http://dx.doi.org/10.21105.joss.00018) +[![JOSS](http://joss.theoj.org/papers/7065e20e97ff4e44695b5e9fef7cdcd8/status.svg)](http://dx.doi.org/10.21105/joss.00018) [![DOI](https://zenodo.org/badge/11450/genomematt/xenomapper.svg)](https://zenodo.org/badge/latestdoi/11450/genomematt/xenomapper) [![DOI](https://img.shields.io/pypi/v/xenomapper.svg)](https://pypi.python.org/pypi/XenoMapper/) @@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ Bug reports should be made to the issue tracker. Difficulty in understanding ho Citing Xenomapper ================= -Xenomapper is published in the Journal of Open Source Software. Please cite the paper in academic publications [DOI:10.21105.joss.00018](http://dx.doi.org/10.21105.joss.00018). Each release also has a Zenodo DOI identifier for each release. In an ideal world this is what you would cite to indicate the code you use, and make everything more reproducible but academic credit is better served at the moment by the paper. Try and include the Zenodo DOI or a version number in your methods. The DOI for the current release is [![DOI](https://zenodo.org/badge/11450/genomematt/xenomapper.svg)](https://zenodo.org/badge/latestdoi/11450/genomematt/xenomapper) +Xenomapper is published in the Journal of Open Source Software. Please cite the paper in academic publications [DOI:10.21105.joss.00018](http://dx.doi.org/10.21105/joss.00018). Each release also has a Zenodo DOI identifier for each release. In an ideal world this is what you would cite to indicate the code you use, and make everything more reproducible but academic credit is better served at the moment by the paper. Try and include the Zenodo DOI or a version number in your methods. The DOI for the current release is [![DOI](https://zenodo.org/badge/11450/genomematt/xenomapper.svg)](https://zenodo.org/badge/latestdoi/11450/genomematt/xenomapper) References =================