New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
sys-apps/hwloc: cuda useflag now required for nvml #21608
Conversation
Pull Request assignmentSubmitter: @Alessandro-Barbieri sys-apps/hwloc: @gentoo/cluster Linked bugsBugs linked: 792477 In order to force reassignment and/or bug reference scan, please append Docs: Code of Conduct ● Copyright policy (expl.) ● Devmanual ● GitHub PRs ● Proxy-maint guide |
Pull request CI reportReport generated at: 2021-07-12 06:59 UTC There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question: |
sys-apps/hwloc/hwloc-2.3.0.ebuild
Outdated
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ BDEPEND=" | |||
virtual/pkgconfig | |||
" | |||
|
|||
REQUIRED_USE="nvml? ( cuda )" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not familiar with this package, but I don't really see why the nvml flag needs to exist if it requires cuda, seems redundant. cuda also ensures the drivers are installed, although /if/ it directly links with nvidia-drivers libraries (haven't checked) it may need a := on drivers for safety (unsure how stable this is from major driver to versions to the next with nvml, maybe not needed).
Edit: Unless there's a reason to enable one and disable the other, in which case it should add cuda deps to nvml rather than REQUIRED_USE (and mask in stable like cuda) -- albeit not sure that's worth it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In a future, cuda may work on amd hardware
a5a119b
to
97acf32
Compare
CI failure needs fixing and/or rebase the PR. |
I'm not sure on what to mask to make the CI happy |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/792477 Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.20, Repoman-3.0.3 Signed-off-by: Alessandro Barbieri <lssndrbarbieri@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alessandro Barbieri <lssndrbarbieri@gmail.com>
97acf32
to
9617f2a
Compare
Signed-off-by: Alessandro Barbieri <lssndrbarbieri@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alessandro Barbieri <lssndrbarbieri@gmail.com>
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/796797 Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.28, Repoman-3.0.3 Signed-off-by: Alessandro Barbieri <lssndrbarbieri@gmail.com>
Pull request CI reportReport generated at: 2021-10-20 03:40 UTC There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question: |
Pull request CI reportReport generated at: 2021-10-20 03:55 UTC There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question: |
Ping |
You haven’t replied to ionen? |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/792477
Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.20, Repoman-3.0.3
Signed-off-by: Alessandro Barbieri lssndrbarbieri@gmail.com