New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Author
Label
Projects
Milestones
Assignee
Sort
velocity unit in the semv file of the simulation result in Specfem2D software
#1093
opened Feb 2, 2021 by
Climber2021
keyword returned wrong parameter PML_BOUNDARY_CONDITIONS instead of nrec
#1092
opened Jan 26, 2021 by
MickyJhon
how to excite a explosive source to generate a pure P-wave in specefem2d
#1086
opened Oct 28, 2020 by
RAYLHU
Poroelastic simulations with porosity larger than or equal to 0.5 don't work
#1048
opened Sep 16, 2019 by
mboxberg
LibGmsh2Specfem_convert_Gmsh_to_Specfem2D_official.py , it can not work well in par with Gmsh_4.1.5
#1034
opened Mar 6, 2019 by
brioglade
Error detected for latest release, in the case of fluid-solid interface and model=binary
#1010
opened Dec 18, 2018 by
meatball880207
Previous Next
ProTip!
Type g i on any issue or pull request to go back to the issue listing page.