We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
GEOS-Chem 12.7.0 will now contain the following additional diagnostics:
Fluxes will be computed for each of the FAST-JX wavelength bins:
187nm, 191nm, '193nm, '196nm, 202nm, 208nm, 211nm, 214nm, '261nm, '267nm, 277nm, 295nm, 303nm, 310nm, '316nm, '333nm, 380nm, 574nm
These netCDF diagnostics correspond to the ND64 bpch diagnostics.
Comparing the UVFlux* diagnostics to the ND64 diagnostics results in differences at the level of numerical noise.
Here is a plot of a short (1-hour) test run at the top of the atmosphere (level 72) of the Diffuse UV flux at 303nm:
And the corresponding zonal mean flux:
The other variables show similar differences to the plots shown above.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
yantosca
No branches or pull requests
New Feature:
GEOS-Chem 12.7.0 will now contain the following additional diagnostics:
Fluxes will be computed for each of the FAST-JX wavelength bins:
These netCDF diagnostics correspond to the ND64 bpch diagnostics.
Validation:
Comparing the UVFlux* diagnostics to the ND64 diagnostics results in differences at the level of numerical noise.
Here is a plot of a short (1-hour) test run at the top of the atmosphere (level 72) of the Diffuse UV flux at 303nm:
And the corresponding zonal mean flux:
The other variables show similar differences to the plots shown above.
References:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: