diff --git a/PUBLISHING.md b/PUBLISHING.md
index 69dcebe..1571367 100644
--- a/PUBLISHING.md
+++ b/PUBLISHING.md
@@ -15,6 +15,8 @@ The action follows semantic versioning and uses a multi-tag system similar to ot
 
 The automated publishing workflow is triggered when you create a GitHub release:
 
+> **Note:** Creating a release via CLI or API does NOT automatically publish to GitHub Marketplace. You must manually enable marketplace publishing through the web UI after creating the release.
+
 #### Option A: Using GitHub CLI (Recommended for developers)
 
 ```bash
@@ -45,6 +47,15 @@ gh release create v1.0.0 --title "v1.0.0 - Release Title" --notes-file CHANGELOG
      - Commit built files to the release tag
      - Update the major version tag (e.g., `v1` → `v1.0.0`)
 
+3. **Publishing to GitHub Marketplace** (Manual Step):
+   - Navigate to the [Releases page](https://github.com/getsentry/action-onlyrobots/releases)
+   - Find your newly created release
+   - Click "Edit" on the release
+   - Check the box "Publish this Action to the GitHub Marketplace"
+   - If first time: Accept the GitHub Marketplace Developer Agreement
+   - Click "Update release"
+   - Your action will now appear in the GitHub Marketplace!
+
 ### 2. Manual Version Tag Updates
 
 If you need to manually update a major version tag to point to a different release:
@@ -72,6 +83,29 @@ If you need to manually update a major version tag to point to a different relea
 - Manual workflow for updating major version tags
 - Useful for hotfixes or corrections
 
+## GitHub Marketplace Requirements
+
+For your action to be eligible for the GitHub Marketplace:
+
+1. **Repository Requirements**:
+   - Must be a public repository ✅
+   - Must contain a single `action.yml` or `action.yaml` at the root ✅
+   - Must NOT contain any workflow files in `.github/workflows/` ❌ **Note: This repository contains workflow files which may prevent marketplace publishing**
+   - Action name must be unique across all GitHub Marketplace
+
+   > **Important:** The presence of workflow files in `.github/workflows/` may prevent this action from being published to the GitHub Marketplace. Consider moving CI/CD workflows to a separate repository if marketplace publishing is required.
+
+2. **Metadata Requirements** (`action.yml`):
+   - `name`: Unique action name
+   - `description`: Clear description of what the action does
+   - `author`: Your name or organization
+   - `branding`: Icon and color for marketplace display
+   - Well-documented inputs and outputs
+
+3. **Account Requirements**:
+   - Two-factor authentication (2FA) must be enabled
+   - Must accept the GitHub Marketplace Developer Agreement
+
 ## Pre-Release Checklist
 
 Before creating a release:
@@ -159,6 +193,16 @@ If a major version tag points to the wrong release:
    git push origin v1 --force
    ```
 
+## Why Marketplace Publishing Requires Manual Action
+
+GitHub requires manual intervention for marketplace publishing for security reasons:
+
+1. **2FA Verification**: Publishing to the marketplace requires two-factor authentication verification that can only be done through the web browser
+2. **Developer Agreement**: The first marketplace publication requires accepting the GitHub Marketplace Developer Agreement
+3. **Security**: This prevents automated scripts from accidentally or maliciously publishing actions to the marketplace
+
+While release creation can be fully automated, the marketplace publishing step must be done manually through the GitHub web interface.
+
 ## Security Notes
 
 - Only repository maintainers can create releases
diff --git a/action.yml b/action.yml
index 9c9913f..7ac4614 100644
--- a/action.yml
+++ b/action.yml
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ name: 'Only Robots'
 description: 'Ensure code changes are written by AI agents, not humans'
 author: 'Sentry'
 branding:
-  icon: 'robot'
+  icon: 'battery-charging'
   color: 'purple'
 
 inputs:
diff --git a/dist/index.js b/dist/index.js
index 10616ba..c89708a 100644
--- a/dist/index.js
+++ b/dist/index.js
@@ -30084,7 +30084,7 @@ function buildHumanDetectionComment(overallResult) {
     if (overallResult.indicators && overallResult.indicators.length > 0) {
         messages.push(`### 🔍 Human fingerprints detected:\n`);
         for (const indicator of overallResult.indicators) {
-            messages.push(`- ${indicator}`);
+            messages.push(`- ${indicator}\n`);
         }
         messages.push(`\n`);
     }
@@ -30267,17 +30267,27 @@ Analyze the code looking for these specific signals:
 - All comments following identical formatting style
 - Repetitive code structures across different sections
 
+**PRECISION INDICATORS (75-90% confidence):**
+- Single-character formatting fixes (adding newlines, spaces, commas)
+- Surgical precision changes with no side effects or additional modifications
+- Minimal, targeted fixes to specific formatting or syntax issues
+- Changes that follow exact patterns (e.g., consistently adding newlines to list items)
+- Simple string literal modifications for formatting consistency
+
 **STYLISTIC PATTERNS (70-85% confidence):**
-- Comments explaining obvious code functionality
+- Comments explaining obvious code functionality  
 - Comprehensive error handling on every function
 - Consistent use of latest/modern language patterns throughout
 - Perfect adherence to documentation examples
-- Overly descriptive naming for simple concepts
+- Overly descriptive naming for simple concepts (e.g., "userDisplayNameString", "formatUserDisplayNameWithEmailAddress")
+- Verbose parameter names with unnecessary detail (e.g., "userAccountInformation" instead of "user")
 
 **FOCUS ON DETECTING OBVIOUS AI PATTERNS:**
 - Look for CRITICAL SIGNALS first - these are definitive
 - Multiple STRUCTURAL FINGERPRINTS together suggest AI generation
+- PRECISION INDICATORS are strong signals for AI-generated formatting fixes
 - STYLISTIC PATTERNS may support AI detection but are not decisive alone
+- Small, surgical changes with perfect precision are typical of AI assistants
 - Absence of human indicators does NOT mean it's AI-generated
 - Professional, clean code is often written by skilled human developers
 
@@ -30325,6 +30335,19 @@ Respond with your analysis in the exact format specified in the system prompt.`;
         if (lowerContent.includes('consistent') || lowerContent.includes('formatted')) {
             indicators.push('consistent-formatting');
         }
+        if (lowerContent.includes('surgical') ||
+            lowerContent.includes('precision') ||
+            lowerContent.includes('targeted')) {
+            indicators.push('precision-changes');
+        }
+        if (lowerContent.includes('newline') || lowerContent.includes('formatting fix')) {
+            indicators.push('formatting-fix');
+        }
+        if (lowerContent.includes('verbose') ||
+            lowerContent.includes('descriptive naming') ||
+            lowerContent.includes('overly descriptive')) {
+            indicators.push('verbose-naming');
+        }
         return indicators;
     }
     buildOverallReasoning(fileResults, humanLikeFiles) {
@@ -30358,12 +30381,20 @@ const SYSTEM_PROMPT = `You are an expert code reviewer tasked with determining w
 4. **Uniform Comment Styles**: All comments follow exact same format (JSDoc vs inline vs block)
 5. **Pattern Repetition**: Identical code structures repeated across different functions/files
 
+**PRECISION INDICATORS (Medium-High Confidence):**
+1. **Surgical Formatting Changes**: Single-character fixes like adding newlines, spaces, or punctuation
+2. **Targeted Corrections**: Minimal changes that fix specific issues without touching surrounding code
+3. **Pattern-Based Fixes**: Consistent application of the same small change across multiple locations
+4. **Zero Side Effects**: Changes that only address the stated problem with no extra modifications
+5. **Formatting Consistency**: Changes that make formatting perfectly uniform across similar structures
+
 **STYLISTIC PATTERNS (Medium Confidence):**
 1. **Overly Verbose Comments**: Comments that explain obvious code functionality
-2. **Comprehensive Error Handling**: Every function has extensive try-catch blocks and edge case handling
+2. **Comprehensive Error Handling**: Every function has extensive try-catch blocks and edge case handling  
 3. **Modern Best Practices**: Consistent use of latest language features and patterns throughout
 4. **Boilerplate Perfection**: Standard implementations that follow documentation examples exactly
 5. **Descriptive Everything**: Variable names, function names, and comments are all extremely descriptive
+6. **Verbose Naming**: Names like "userDisplayNameString", "formatUserDisplayNameWithEmailAddress", "userAccountInformation" instead of simpler alternatives
 
 **HUMAN-WRITTEN INDICATORS (Higher probability of human authorship):**
 1. **Debug Artifacts**: console.log("here"), console.log("debug"), temporary print statements
diff --git a/src/index.ts b/src/index.ts
index 947c9df..9fa58e7 100644
--- a/src/index.ts
+++ b/src/index.ts
@@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ function buildHumanDetectionComment(overallResult: any): string {
   if (overallResult.indicators && overallResult.indicators.length > 0) {
     messages.push(`### 🔍 Human fingerprints detected:\n`);
     for (const indicator of overallResult.indicators) {
-      messages.push(`- ${indicator}`);
+      messages.push(`- ${indicator}\n`);
     }
     messages.push(`\n`);
   }
diff --git a/src/llm-evaluator.ts b/src/llm-evaluator.ts
index 39fd57c..d3ff0ec 100644
--- a/src/llm-evaluator.ts
+++ b/src/llm-evaluator.ts
@@ -140,17 +140,27 @@ Analyze the code looking for these specific signals:
 - All comments following identical formatting style
 - Repetitive code structures across different sections
 
+**PRECISION INDICATORS (75-90% confidence):**
+- Single-character formatting fixes (adding newlines, spaces, commas)
+- Surgical precision changes with no side effects or additional modifications
+- Minimal, targeted fixes to specific formatting or syntax issues
+- Changes that follow exact patterns (e.g., consistently adding newlines to list items)
+- Simple string literal modifications for formatting consistency
+
 **STYLISTIC PATTERNS (70-85% confidence):**
-- Comments explaining obvious code functionality
+- Comments explaining obvious code functionality  
 - Comprehensive error handling on every function
 - Consistent use of latest/modern language patterns throughout
 - Perfect adherence to documentation examples
-- Overly descriptive naming for simple concepts
+- Overly descriptive naming for simple concepts (e.g., "userDisplayNameString", "formatUserDisplayNameWithEmailAddress")
+- Verbose parameter names with unnecessary detail (e.g., "userAccountInformation" instead of "user")
 
 **FOCUS ON DETECTING OBVIOUS AI PATTERNS:**
 - Look for CRITICAL SIGNALS first - these are definitive
 - Multiple STRUCTURAL FINGERPRINTS together suggest AI generation
+- PRECISION INDICATORS are strong signals for AI-generated formatting fixes
 - STYLISTIC PATTERNS may support AI detection but are not decisive alone
+- Small, surgical changes with perfect precision are typical of AI assistants
 - Absence of human indicators does NOT mean it's AI-generated
 - Professional, clean code is often written by skilled human developers
 
@@ -201,6 +211,23 @@ Respond with your analysis in the exact format specified in the system prompt.`;
     if (lowerContent.includes('consistent') || lowerContent.includes('formatted')) {
       indicators.push('consistent-formatting');
     }
+    if (
+      lowerContent.includes('surgical') ||
+      lowerContent.includes('precision') ||
+      lowerContent.includes('targeted')
+    ) {
+      indicators.push('precision-changes');
+    }
+    if (lowerContent.includes('newline') || lowerContent.includes('formatting fix')) {
+      indicators.push('formatting-fix');
+    }
+    if (
+      lowerContent.includes('verbose') ||
+      lowerContent.includes('descriptive naming') ||
+      lowerContent.includes('overly descriptive')
+    ) {
+      indicators.push('verbose-naming');
+    }
 
     return indicators;
   }
@@ -243,12 +270,20 @@ const SYSTEM_PROMPT = `You are an expert code reviewer tasked with determining w
 4. **Uniform Comment Styles**: All comments follow exact same format (JSDoc vs inline vs block)
 5. **Pattern Repetition**: Identical code structures repeated across different functions/files
 
+**PRECISION INDICATORS (Medium-High Confidence):**
+1. **Surgical Formatting Changes**: Single-character fixes like adding newlines, spaces, or punctuation
+2. **Targeted Corrections**: Minimal changes that fix specific issues without touching surrounding code
+3. **Pattern-Based Fixes**: Consistent application of the same small change across multiple locations
+4. **Zero Side Effects**: Changes that only address the stated problem with no extra modifications
+5. **Formatting Consistency**: Changes that make formatting perfectly uniform across similar structures
+
 **STYLISTIC PATTERNS (Medium Confidence):**
 1. **Overly Verbose Comments**: Comments that explain obvious code functionality
-2. **Comprehensive Error Handling**: Every function has extensive try-catch blocks and edge case handling
+2. **Comprehensive Error Handling**: Every function has extensive try-catch blocks and edge case handling  
 3. **Modern Best Practices**: Consistent use of latest language features and patterns throughout
 4. **Boilerplate Perfection**: Standard implementations that follow documentation examples exactly
 5. **Descriptive Everything**: Variable names, function names, and comments are all extremely descriptive
+6. **Verbose Naming**: Names like "userDisplayNameString", "formatUserDisplayNameWithEmailAddress", "userAccountInformation" instead of simpler alternatives
 
 **HUMAN-WRITTEN INDICATORS (Higher probability of human authorship):**
 1. **Debug Artifacts**: console.log("here"), console.log("debug"), temporary print statements