From c07b46224932faaa63a5da4901288fa81883a5e5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matt Johnson-Pint Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2023 16:56:02 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] rfc(feature): Exception Groups --- README.md | 1 + text/0079-exception-groups.md | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+) create mode 100644 text/0079-exception-groups.md diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index 301a7ca5..397ec461 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -35,3 +35,4 @@ This repository contains RFCs and DACIs. Lost? - [0070-document-sensitive-data-collected](text/0070-document-sensitive-data-collected.md): Document sensitive data collected - [0071-continue-trace-over-process-boundaries](text/0071-continue-trace-over-process-boundaries.md): Continue trace over process boundaries - [0072-kafka-schema-registry](text/0072-kafka-schema-registry.md): Kafka Schema Registry +- [0079-exception-groups](text/0079-exception-groups.md): Exception Groups diff --git a/text/0079-exception-groups.md b/text/0079-exception-groups.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..8232bd4c --- /dev/null +++ b/text/0079-exception-groups.md @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ +- Start Date: 2023-03-06 +- RFC Type: feature +- RFC PR: https://github.com/getsentry/rfcs/pull/79 +- RFC Status: draft + +# Summary + +One paragraph explanation of the feature or document purpose. + +# Motivation + +Why are we doing this? What use cases does it support? What is the expected outcome? + +# Background + +The reason this decision or document is required. This section might not always exist. + +# Supporting Data + +[Metrics to help support your decision (if applicable).] + +# Options Considered + +If an RFC does not know yet what the options are, it can propose multiple options. The +preferred model is to propose one option and to provide alternatives. + +# Drawbacks + +Why should we not do this? What are the drawbacks of this RFC or a particular option if +multiple options are presented. + +# Unresolved questions + +- What parts of the design do you expect to resolve through this RFC? +- What issues are out of scope for this RFC but are known?