Skip to content

Conversation

chadwhitacre
Copy link
Member

Pretty sure I've got this right, based on both reading docs and experimenting ... assuming this is desired behavior?

Part of #627, addresses #634 (comment).

Pretty sure I've got this right, based on both reading docs and
experimenting.
@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Member Author

💃

Screen Shot 2020-08-20 at 10 37 54 PM

Copy link
Member

@BYK BYK left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks a lot!

@BYK BYK changed the title Fine-tune GHA event bindings ci(gha): Fine-tune GHA event bindings Aug 23, 2020
@BYK BYK merged commit e8d882c into getsentry:master Aug 23, 2020
BYK added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2020
Since #634 and #639 we are using GitHub Actions for pushes and PRs and don't need Travis CI. Thanks for all the 🐟
@BYK BYK mentioned this pull request Aug 27, 2020
BYK added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2020
Since #634 and #639 we are using GitHub Actions for pushes and PRs and don't need Travis CI. Thanks for all the 🐟
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 14, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants