Add missing rexml dependency#638
Add missing rexml dependency#638gettalong merged 1 commit intogettalong:masterfrom deivid-rodriguez:add_missing_rexml_dependency
Conversation
The next ruby version won't have rexml as a default gem, so it will need to be explicitly added as a dependency.
Just curious.. Isn't the next ruby version Ruby 3.0? |
|
I test my library against ruby-head to be able to early address any ruby-core incompatibilities. My build against ruby-head broke because of the mentioned change, since under current ruby-head This change should be correct regardless, because Just let me know and I'll close the PR accordingly. |
|
@deivid-rodriguez I was just asking out of curiosity. I'm not a maintainer of this project.. |
|
Oh, ok, sorry. Well, I hope I answered your question in any case :) |
|
I should probably also add that this change does have an impact. For example, if |
|
Actually, those same things can already happen currently, but the changes only happen accross ruby releases. With this PR, any change in the |
|
@deivid-rodriguez Thank you for your contribution! |
|
Thanks for merging! ❤️ |
|
I'm still getting this error:
Is this related to above? |
|
I don't think this fix has been released yet, so could be related, yeah. Does it get fixed if you manually install |
|
@caser Please try the latest version of kramdown and see if it works! |
|
Any progress on this? I just ran into it, as kramdown is a transitive dependency. I had to explicitly include rexml, which now makes my install a little more fragile. |
|
@JetForMe This change was shipped in |
The next ruby version won't have rexml as a default gem, so it will need to be explicitly added as a dependency.
See https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/16485#change-83794.