New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add missing rexml dependency #638
Add missing rexml dependency #638
Conversation
The next ruby version won't have rexml as a default gem, so it will need to be explicitly added as a dependency.
Just curious.. Isn't the next ruby version Ruby 3.0? |
I test my library against ruby-head to be able to early address any ruby-core incompatibilities. My build against ruby-head broke because of the mentioned change, since under current ruby-head This change should be correct regardless, because Just let me know and I'll close the PR accordingly. |
@deivid-rodriguez I was just asking out of curiosity. I'm not a maintainer of this project.. |
Oh, ok, sorry. Well, I hope I answered your question in any case :) |
I should probably also add that this change does have an impact. For example, if |
Actually, those same things can already happen currently, but the changes only happen accross ruby releases. With this PR, any change in the |
@deivid-rodriguez Thank you for your contribution! |
Thanks for merging! |
I'm still getting this error:
Is this related to above? |
I don't think this fix has been released yet, so could be related, yeah. Does it get fixed if you manually install |
@caser Please try the latest version of kramdown and see if it works! |
Any progress on this? I just ran into it, as kramdown is a transitive dependency. I had to explicitly include rexml, which now makes my install a little more fragile. |
@JetForMe This change was shipped in |
The next ruby version won't have rexml as a default gem, so it will need to be explicitly added as a dependency.
See https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/16485#change-83794.