Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

0.9.19 release ? #166

Open
Dam23 opened this issue Jan 12, 2017 · 1 comment
Open

0.9.19 release ? #166

Dam23 opened this issue Jan 12, 2017 · 1 comment

Comments

@Dam23
Copy link

Dam23 commented Jan 12, 2017

Hello everyone, ghantoos,

The FreeBSD port of lshell is still stuck on 0.9.16 revision 2, that is your release from 2013 and a couple patches (one by you, another by myself) :
http://www.freshports.org/shells/lshell/

I would like to push the newest version to FreeBSD.
However it seems that some issues have been fixed after 0.9.18 release, which is the latest available :
#122
#147
#149

Would you kindly release 0.9.19 (or whatever you had in mind) incorporating said fixes ?

I also seek confirmation that #151 is now corrected.
I have been unable to reproduce on FreeBSD 10-STABLE with sudo, but then I might be doing that incorrectly.

It would also seem that since 0.9.16 you've changed the naming scheme for the file, going from lshell-$version to lshell_$version.
That is a very minor difference but it forces me to make some adjustments to the port's Makefile.

Might you consider pushing further releases as lshell dash $version as was the case with 0.9.16 ?

I thank you for your help and remain available should you have any question.
Our company makes use of lshell with regards to PCI-DSS compliance, I shall be happy to help :)

@fabaff
Copy link

fabaff commented Mar 25, 2017

I'm looking for a new release as well. As for the Fedora and EPEL packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369345 is still open.

Thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants