Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
GH-2086, GH-2084, GH-2040: Update intro hub Get Plus, Midnight & Insights Modal CTA link #595
GH-2086, GH-2084, GH-2040: Update intro hub Get Plus, Midnight & Insights Modal CTA link #595
Changes from 1 commit
e08587fcc07a5a21d398badbe0b80011288a4be00c874760b8b0e10fFile filter
Jump to
Use ghostery root domain from globals
fcjrAug 13, 2020
Member
you need to expand
CHECKOUT_BASE_URLhere to use it belowwlycdgrAug 13, 2020
Member
@fcjr @benstrumeyer we actually should also use
GHOSTERY_ROOT_DOMAIN/GHOSTERY_ROOT_URLhere, as per #594fcjrAug 13, 2020
Member
@wlycdgr We might as well close #594 and just update this link in this PR as well then.
wlycdgrAug 13, 2020
Member
@fcjr good idea
benstrumeyerAug 13, 2020
Author
Contributor
I missed that! Added, and also updated the insights link, as per #594
fcjrAug 13, 2020
•
edited
Member
it would also be nice to add a
GHOSTERY_WEBSITE_BASE_URLglobal to avoid managing the protocol and subdomain throughout the code.benstrumeyerAug 13, 2020
Author
Contributor
Great idea, added that variable and used it here
fcjrAug 13, 2020
Member
please use
CHECKOUT_BASE_URLherebenstrumeyerAug 13, 2020
Author
Contributor
Good catch! Changed to use
CHECKOUT_BASE_URL