Vie privée : Notifier puis archiver les comptes candidats sans candidature inactifs depuis plus de 12 mois [GEN-1339] - #5861
Merged
Conversation
vincentporte
marked this pull request as draft
April 1, 2025 13:44
vincentporte
force-pushed
the
vp/GEN-1339_archivage
branch
2 times, most recently
from
April 2, 2025 14:39
d5b37cf to
c02ace8
Compare
vincentporte
marked this pull request as ready for review
April 2, 2025 14:39
vincentporte
force-pushed
the
vp/GEN-1339_archivage
branch
from
April 2, 2025 14:41
c02ace8 to
9ae91a5
Compare
vincentporte
marked this pull request as draft
April 3, 2025 12:13
vincentporte
force-pushed
the
vp/GEN-1339_archivage
branch
from
April 3, 2025 14:47
9ae91a5 to
6ee751f
Compare
vincentporte
commented
Apr 3, 2025
xavfernandez
reviewed
Apr 7, 2025
vincentporte
force-pushed
the
vp/GEN-1339_archivage
branch
8 times, most recently
from
April 9, 2025 14:52
18c1a83 to
4029be7
Compare
vincentporte
force-pushed
the
vp/GEN-1339_archivage
branch
from
April 16, 2025 08:45
4029be7 to
cc4b79f
Compare
vincentporte
marked this pull request as ready for review
April 16, 2025 08:47
vincentporte
force-pushed
the
vp/GEN-1339_archivage
branch
from
April 16, 2025 08:49
cc4b79f to
397455f
Compare
vincentporte
force-pushed
the
vp/GEN-1339_archivage
branch
from
April 16, 2025 10:52
c4f5ba2 to
0a1c8d3
Compare
xavfernandez
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Je me demande si au final on gagne tant que cela de passer par 2 commandes.
On pourrait potentiellement tout regrouper dans une commande dans l'app archive qui évitera la réutilisation un peu bancale du is_active.
Author
C'est tentant ! L'idée de garder les deux traitements séparés permet de spécialiser les commandes par type d'utilisateurs sur ceux à selectionner, puis de laisser une grosse commande |
vincentporte
force-pushed
the
vp/GEN-1339_archivage
branch
3 times, most recently
from
April 16, 2025 22:12
e3bfb19 to
c299597
Compare
vincentporte
force-pushed
the
vp/GEN-1339_archivage
branch
from
April 17, 2025 07:31
c299597 to
2b6574b
Compare
vincentporte
force-pushed
the
vp/GEN-1339_archivage
branch
from
April 17, 2025 13:21
2b6574b to
876fb72
Compare
vincentporte
force-pushed
the
vp/GEN-1339_archivage
branch
from
April 17, 2025 16:22
d2fda8d to
9a181bc
Compare
vincentporte
force-pushed
the
vp/GEN-1339_archivage
branch
from
April 22, 2025 06:58
9a181bc to
b374b2c
Compare
vincentporte
force-pushed
the
vp/GEN-1339_archivage
branch
from
April 22, 2025 07:01
b374b2c to
b6514a5
Compare
xavfernandez
approved these changes
Apr 22, 2025
vincentporte
added this pull request to the merge queue
Apr 22, 2025
This was referenced Apr 22, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
🤔 Pourquoi ?
RGPD
Carte notion limitée à la notification et l'anonymisation des candidats sans candidature, ni Pass, ni Diag et inactifs depuis 12 mois.
🍰 Comment ?
jobseekernotifiablesjobseekeret valorisernotified_before_deletion_atdansUserjobseekerarchivablesjobseekeret les passer à l'état inactif🚨 À vérifier
NON Mettre à jour le CHANGELOG_breaking_changes.md ?
NON Ajouter l'étiquette « Bug » ?
🏝️ Comment tester ?
💻 Captures d'écran