Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Issue with 3 Lindemann–Weierstrass_theorem #23

Closed
AndreG-P opened this issue Jan 9, 2018 · 1 comment
Closed

Issue with 3 Lindemann–Weierstrass_theorem #23

AndreG-P opened this issue Jan 9, 2018 · 1 comment
Assignees
@AndreG-P
Labels
help wanted qID need improvements question

Comments

@AndreG-P
Copy link
Member

AndreG-P commented Jan 9, 2018 •
edited by philsMINT
Loading

Does factorial needs a QID or not?
Link to Lindemann–Weierstrass_theorem, qID 3
@AndreG-P AndreG-P mentioned this issue Jan 11, 2018
Closed
@philsMINT
Copy link
Member

philsMINT commented Jan 11, 2018 •
edited
Loading

I think it is not necessary - there are other elementary operators like \exp who did not get a QID
-> see discussion in the paper section line (psl) 98

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@AndreG-P AndreG-P

Labels
help wanted qID need improvements question
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@AndreG-P @philsMINT