You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Right now, we've got some automated commit bots that end up polluting our statistics.
It'd be nice if there was a way to exclude user(s) from being included in like the
percentage breakdown by authors.
Reported by chorohoe@wikimedia.org on 2013-06-05 21:14:47
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We can do something about that. A global setting and a repo setting, I think.
I see the temptation of building from master was too great for you. :) It's not quite
finished, but let me know if you run into any regressions.
BTW, you have Gitblit's git servlet enabled but you are not specifying access restrictions
- in Gitblit. Are you controlling that with Groovy push hooks?
At a quick glance, it looks like I can rewind any repo I choose as anonymous by pushing
to your Gitblit. Perhaps you should set git.enableGitServlet = false and let Gerrit
do all the work or you could set git.defaultAccessRestriction = PUSH, and any repo
that is using the current default access restriction (NONE) _should_ automatically
use PUSH instead. I haven't tested that combination with the new URL panel. I'll
do that today.
Things seem mostly fine with 1.3.0-SNAPSHOT. I'll file separate bugs if I hit anything.
I basically want gitblit to act as a dumb repo viewer. Everything should be viewable
(and preferably fetchable) via
anonymous access, and no write actions should happen ever.
Originally reported on Google Code with ID 251
Reported by
chorohoe@wikimedia.org
on 2013-06-05 21:14:47The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: