Range loops with ignored variables result in false-positives

[kalexmills]

There's another false positive which can occur when a range loop ignores all of its variables, as seen in this finding.

This range loop ranges over a channel and ignores the results returned from the ticker.

Click here for code

               for _ = range ticker.C {
			ch := make(chan bool)
			go func() {
				err = a.Client.Call(a.ctx, "GetInfo", &common.ServerInfo, &common.Config)
				if err != nil {
					a.log("RPC Client Call:", err.Error())
					return
				}
				ch <- true
			}()
			// Server集群列表获取
			select {
			case <-ch:
				serverList, err := a.getServerList()
				if err != nil {
					a.log("RPC Client Call:", err.Error())
					break
				}
				if len(serverList) == 0 {
					a.log("No server node available")
					break
				}
				if len(serverList) == len(a.ServerList) {
					for i, server := range serverList {
						// TODO 可能会产生问题
						if server != a.ServerList[i] {
							a.ServerList = serverList
							// 防止正在传输重置client导致数据丢失
							a.Mutex.Lock()
							a.Client.Close()
							a.newClient()
							a.Mutex.Unlock()
							break
						}
					}
				} else {
					a.log("Server nodes from old to new:", a.ServerList, "->", serverList)
					a.ServerList = serverList
					a.Mutex.Lock()
					a.Client.Close()
					a.newClient()
					a.Mutex.Unlock()
				}
			case <-time.NewTicker(time.Second * 3).C:
				break
			}
		}

[kalexmills]

Considering wontfix for this, since I'm not seeing enough instances in practice.