Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 21, 2023. It is now read-only.

Implemented querying concurrent schema #45

Closed

Conversation

AnshumanTripathi
Copy link

Implemented concurrent querying over shards

Copy link
Contributor

@shlomi-noach shlomi-noach left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi, thank you for this PR.
Generally, it would be best to first open an Issue and discuss what it is you're trying to do, and from there on take it to a PR.

As it stands, there's quite some changes I'd appreciate if ccql is to support the change you wish to incorporate.

I'm also concerned with the concurrency model you used for "concurrent hosts" and "concurrent schemas", because the latter is scattered in the former. There's really one concurrency cap and not two. ccql already offers max-concurrency, so why not use that.

Please always be backwards compatible. Your changes will break the behavior for everyone.

help := flag.Bool("help", false, "Display usage")
user := flag.String("u", osUser, "MySQL username")
password := flag.String("p", "", "MySQL password")
askPassword := flag.Bool("ask-pass", false, "prompt for MySQL password")
credentialsFile := flag.String("C", "", "Credentials file, expecting [client] scope, with 'user', 'password' fields. Overrides -u and -p")
defaultSchema := flag.String("d", "information_schema", "Default schema to use")
schemaList := flag.String("s", "information_schema", "List of Schema to query from.")
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is a breaking, incompatible change. Please avoid doing this. Find a backwards compatible way.

}
User string
Password string
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

gofmt will fail on this change of indentation.

@@ -117,7 +119,9 @@ func main() {
*password = string(passwd)
}

if err := logic.QueryHosts(hosts, *user, *password, *defaultSchema, queries, *maxConcurrency, *timeout); err != nil {
schemas := strings.Split(*schemaList, ",")
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please handle whitespace

go/logic/ccql.go Outdated
@@ -28,7 +29,7 @@ func queryHost(host string, user string, password string, defaultSchema string,
output = append(output, rowCell.String)
}
rowOutput := strings.Join(output, "\t")
fmt.Println(rowOutput)
fmt.Println(defaultSchema, rowOutput)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Breaking change

go/logic/ccql.go Outdated
anyError = err
log.Printf("%s %s", host, err.Error())
}
<-concurrentSchemas
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the <- should be in a defer function call at the beginning of this routine

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I encourage you to use WaitGroup

@AnshumanTripathi
Copy link
Author

Thanks for the comments. I apologize as I was not aware of opening an issue before giving out a pull request. I will incorporate these changes and update my PR. Also, should I open an issue now?

@shlomi-noach
Copy link
Contributor

Also, should I open an issue now?

Since we're already here, let's just make progress here.

go/logic/ccql.go Outdated
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ func queryHost(host string, user string, password string, defaultSchema string,
return err
}
for _, row := range resultData {
output := []string{host}
output := []string{host, schema}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is breaking existing behavior: this change forces the addition of the schema column. Perhaps omit the schema column if only a single schema is specified? I'm wondering whether there should be a command line flag to show/hide schema?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

When working with multi sharded environment, the visibility of the schema column becomes an asset. But I agree this can be a breaking change, and I can try to add a command line flag to view the schema and only if that flag is set, the schema column becomes visible.

go/logic/ccql.go Outdated
anyError = err
log.Printf("%s %s", host, err.Error())
}
defer wg.Done()
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

defer functions should appear first thing in the enclosing function.

go/logic/ccql.go Outdated
mysqlURI := fmt.Sprintf("%s:%s@tcp(%s)/%s?timeout=%fs", user, password, host, schema, timeout)
db, _, err := sqlutils.GetDB(mysqlURI)
if err != nil {
return err
}

fmt.Println()
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why is this Println() added?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

When using the flag --ask-pass the results are shown are next to the Enter Password phrase. Will try to make this formatting better.

go/logic/ccql.go Outdated
output := []string{host}
if viewSourceSchema {
outputSchema := []string{schema}
output = append(output, outputSchema...)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

simpler:

output = append(output, schema)

go/logic/ccql.go Outdated
output[0] = host
output := []string{host}
if viewSourceSchema {
outputSchema := []string{schema}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

no need for this

@shlomi-noach
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for this pull request! This is looking good. I may yet tweak with command line params, trying to consider what would make most sense with backward compatibility. Noting that I'll be out on holiday for a while and so merging may be delayed.

@AnshumanTripathi
Copy link
Author

That is so good to hear. Looking forward to seeing this merged soon.

@shlomi-noach
Copy link
Contributor

@AnshumanTripathi this is now resubmitted as #48 . Please see how I fixed the WaitGroup to be more fair to all hosts/queries.
Also note I introduced -s <list of schemas>.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants