I agree to use a = -->, but is this considered expected functionality? I was just reading the code and saw that you can name a function using the label syntax and saw that currying doesn't work with this. If this is expected, should the parser maybe throw an error when this is occurred?
If you have a named function that curries (I think that's how you'd name it?), the function isn't scoped properly.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: